Fors Clavigera (Volume 2 of 8): Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great BritainRuskin, John
General
Fors Clavigera (Volume 2 of 8): Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain
Ruskin, John
Aesthetics; Conduct of life; Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Social problems; Working class -- Great Britain
I have received from Wells, in Somersetshire, thirty pounds for the
St. George's Fund, the first money sent me by a stranger. For what has
been given me by my personal friends I will account to them privately;
and, henceforward, will accept no more given in their courteous
prejudice, lest other friends, who do not believe in my crotchets,
should be made uncomfortable. I am not quite sure if the sender of
this money from Somersetshire would like his name to appear in so
wide solitude; and therefore content myself with thus thanking him,
and formally opening my accounts.
FORS CLAVIGERA.
LETTER XX.
Venice, 3rd July, 1872.
My Friends,
You probably thought I had lost my temper, and written inconsiderately,
when I called the whistling of the Lido steamer 'accursed.'
I never wrote more considerately; using the longer and weaker word
'accursed' instead of the simple and proper one, 'cursed,' to take
away, as far as I could, the appearance of unseemly haste; and using
the expression itself on set purpose, not merely as the fittest for
the occasion, but because I have more to tell you respecting the
general benediction engraved on the bell of Lucca, and the particular
benediction bestowed on the Marquis of B.; several things more,
indeed, of importance for you to know, about blessing and cursing.
Some of you may perhaps remember the saying of St. James about the
tongue: "Therewith bless we God, and therewith curse we men; out of
the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these
things ought not so to be."
It is not clear whether St. James means that there should be no cursing
at all, (which I suppose he does,) or merely that the blessing and
cursing should not be uttered by the same lips. But his meaning,
whatever it was, did not, in the issue, matter; for the Church of
Christendom has always ignored this text altogether, and appointed
the same persons in authority to deliver on all needful occasions,
benediction or malediction, as either might appear to them due;
while our own most learned sect, wielding State power, has not only
appointed a formal service of malediction in Lent, but commanded
the Psalms of David, in which the blessing and cursing are inlaid as
closely as the black and white in a mosaic floor, to be solemnly sung
through once a month.
I do not wish, however, to-day to speak to you of the practice of
the churches; but of your own, which, observe, is in one respect
singularly different. All the churches, of late years, paying less
and less attention to the discipline of their people, have felt an
increasing compunction in cursing them when they did wrong; while also,
the wrong doing, through such neglect of discipline, becoming every day
more complex, ecclesiastical authorities perceived that, if delivered
with impartiality, the cursing must be so general, and the blessing
so defined, as to give their services an entirely unpopular character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account