Fors Clavigera (Volume 5 of 8): Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great BritainRuskin, John
General
Fors Clavigera (Volume 5 of 8): Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain
Ruskin, John
Aesthetics; Conduct of life; Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Social problems; Working class -- Great Britain
Agnes and I perceive that for the present there is an end of the matter
for us; and retreat to our Bingley, there to console ourselves with
hearing how Mr. Wildman, whose remarks on the management of bees are
well known, possessed a secret by which “he could at any time cause a
hive of bees to swarm upon his head, shoulders, or body, in a most
surprising manner. He has been seen to drink a glass of wine, having at
the same time the bees all over his head and face more than an inch
deep: several fell into the glass, but they did not sting him. He could
even act the part of a general with them, by marshalling them in battle
array upon a large table. There he divided them into regiments,
battalions, and companies, according to military discipline, waiting
only for his word of command. The moment he uttered the word ‘march!’
they began to march in a regular manner, like soldiers. To these
insects he also taught so much politeness, that they never attempted to
sting any of the numerous company.”
Agnes, on reading this, is sure to ask me ‘how he taught them?’ Which
is just what, as a student of new methods of education, I should like
to know myself; and not a word is said on the matter: and we are
presently pushed on into the history of the larger animal which I call
a humble, but Agnes, a bumble, bee. Not, however, clearly knowing
myself either what the ways of this kind are, or why they should be
called humble, when I always find them at the top of a thistle rather
than the bottom, I spend half my morning in hunting through my
scientific books for information on this matter, and find whole pages
of discussion whether the orange-tailed bee is the same as the
white-tailed bee, but nothing about why either should be called humble
or bumble:—at last I bethink me of the great despiser of natural
history; and find that stout Samuel, with his good editor Mr. Todd,
have given me all I want; but there is far more and better authority
for ‘bumble’ than I thought. However;—this first guess of Johnson’s own
assuredly touches one popular, though it appears mistaken, reason for
the Shakespearian form. “The humble bee is known to have no sting. The
Scotch call a cow without horns a ‘humble cow.’” But truly, I have
never myself yet had clear faith enough in that absence of sting to
catch a humble bee in my fingers; [10] only I suppose Bottom would have
warned Cobweb against that danger, if there had been such, as well as
against being overflown with the honey bag. [11] Red-hipped, Bottom
calls them; and yet I find nothing about their red hips anywhere in my
books.
We have not done with the name yet, however. It is from the Teutonic
‘hommolen,’ bombum edere: (in good time, some years hence, Agnes shall
know what Teutons are,—what bombs are,—shall read my great passage in
‘Unto this Last’ about bombshells and peaches; and shall know how
distinct the Latin root of Edition and Editor is from that of
Edification).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account