Fors Clavigera (Volume 6 of 8): $b Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great BritainRuskin, John
General
Fors Clavigera (Volume 6 of 8): $b Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain
Ruskin, John
Aesthetics; Conduct of life; Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Social problems; Working class -- Great Britain
c. I envy my correspondent’s complacency in his own and his Society’s
munificence, too sorrowfully to endeavour to dispel it.
d. The ‘verbal’ agreement is indeed secured by the alteration. But as
St. Paul, by a ‘brother,’ meant any Christian, I shall be glad to learn
from my correspondent whether the Wesleyans understand their rule in
that significance.
e. Many thanks to Mr. Wesley. Doubtless his disciples know what rate of
interest is lawful, and what not; and also by what law it was made so;
and always pause with pious accuracy at the decimal point whereat the
excellence of an investment begins to make it criminal. St. George will
be grateful to their representative for information on these—not
unimportant—particulars.
f. How far that is, my correspondent’s duly dissenting scorn of the
wisdom of the Greeks, and legality of the Jews, has doubtless prevented
his thinking it necessary to discover. I must not waste the time of
other readers in assisting his elementary investigations; but have
merely to point out to him that definitions either of theft, adultery,
usury, or murder, have only become necessary in modern times; and that
Methodists, and any other persons, are charged by me with breaking the
law of Moses, David, and Christ, in so far only as they do accept Mr.
John Wesley’s, or any other person’s, definition instead of their
utterly unquestionable meaning. (Would T. S., of North Tyne, reprint
his letters for me from the Sunderland paper, to be sent out with
December Fors?)
IV. I reprint the following paragraph chiefly as an example of our
ineffable British absurdity. It is perfectly right to compel fathers to
send their children to school; but, once sent, it is the schoolmaster’s
business to keep hold of them. In St. George’s schools, it would have
been the little runaway gentleman who would have got sent to prison;
and kept, sotto piombi, on bread and water, until he could be trusted
with more liberty. The fate of the father, under the present
application of British law, leaves the problem, it seems to me, still
insoluble but in that manner. But I should like to know more of the
previous history of parent and child.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account