Fors Clavigera (Volume 6 of 8): $b Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great BritainRuskin, John
General
Fors Clavigera (Volume 6 of 8): $b Letters to the workmen and labourers of Great Britain
Ruskin, John
Aesthetics; Conduct of life; Great Britain -- Social conditions -- 19th century; Social problems; Working class -- Great Britain
[78] This passage, in capitals, being wholly astounding to me, I
venture to put a note of interrogation to it. I have long myself been
questioning the farmers in Westmoreland about the quantity of rank bog
grass they let grow. But their only idea of improvement is to burn the
heather; this being a cheap operation, and dangerous only to their
neighbours’ woods. Brantwood was within an ace of becoming Brantashes
last summer.
[79] The name of the—certainly very efficient—teacher of these young
people, and the general principles of their tuition, would have been a
desirable addition, St. George thinks, to the information furnished by
Mr. Mackenzie.
[80] I suppose myself, in the rest of this letter, to be addressing a
“business man of the nineteenth century.”
[81] Thus, in the earlier numbers of Fors, I have observed more than
once, to the present landholders of England, that they may keep their
lands—if they can! Only let them understand that trial will soon be
made, by the Laws of Nature, of such capacity in them.
[82] A masterless dog, I should have written, but wanted to keep my
sentence short and down to my practical friend’s capacity. For if the
dog have the good fortune to find a master, he has a possession
thenceforth, better than bones; and which, indeed, he will, at any
moment, leave, not his meat only, but his life for.
[83] It is a very subtle and lovely one, not to be discussed hurriedly.
[84] See ‘definition’ quoted as satisfactory in ‘Anthropological
Magazine,’ “the belief in spiritual beings,” which would make the devil
a religious person, inasmuch as he both believes—and fears.
[85] See the last results of modern enlightenment on this subject in
Mr. Waterhouse Hawkins’s directions for the scientific representation
of Dogs, illustrated by the charming drawings of that great
artist;—especially compare the learned outlines of head and paw in
Plate II., and the delineation of head without Psyche in Plate III.,
with the ignorant efforts of Velasquez in such extremities and features
in our fourth photograph. Perhaps Mr. Waterhouse Hawkins will have the
goodness, in his next edition, to show us how Velasquez ought to have
expressed the Scapholinear, Cuneiform, Pisiform, Trapezium, Trapezoid,
Magnum, and Unciform bones in those miserably drawn fore-paws.
[86] Being somewhat interested in Croydon, as readers of past Fors
know, and in Museums also, I give large print to these proposals.
[87] I have no doubt of the mingled active sense of τίμιος in this
sentence, necessary by the context; while also the phrase would be a
mere flat truism, if the word were used only in its ordinary passive
meaning.
[88] To see clearly that whatever our fates may have been, the heaviest
calamity of them—and, in a sort, the only real calamity—is our own
causing, is the true humility which indeed we profess with our lips,
when our heart is far from it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account