Peter's failure was only partial. There was no question that “The Stone
House” was a remarkable book. Had it been Peter's first novel it must
have made an immense stir; it showed that he was, in no kind of way,
a man of one book, and it gave, in its London scenes, proof that its
author was not limited to one kind of life and one kind of background.
There were chapters that were fuller, wiser, in every way more mature
than anything in “Reuben Hallard.”
But it was amazingly unequal. There were places in it that had no kind
of life at all; at times Peter appeared to have beheld his scenes and
characters through a mist, to have been dragged right away from any kind
of vision of the book, to have written wildly, blindly.
The opinion of Mrs. Launce was perhaps the soundest that it was possible
to have because that good lady, in spite of her affection for Peter,
had a critical judgment that was partly literary, partly commercial, and
partly human. She always judged a book first with her brain, then with
her heart and lastly with her knowledge of her fellow creatures. “It may
pay better than 'Reuben Hallard,'” she said, “there's more love interest
and it ends happily. Some of it is beautifully written, some of it quite
unspeakably. But really, Peter, it's the most uneven thing I've ever
read. Again and again one is caught, held, stirred--then, suddenly, you
slip away altogether--you aren't there at all, nothing's there, I could
put my ringer on the places. Especially the first chapters and the last
chapters--the middle's splendid--what happened to you?... But it will
sell, I expect. Tell your banker to read it, go into lots of banks
and tell them. Bank clerks have subscriptions at circulating libraries
always given them ... but the wild bits are best, the wild bits are
splendid--that bit about the rocks at night ... you don't know much
about women yet--your girls are awfully bad. By the way, do you know
that Mary Hollins is only getting £100 advance next time? All she can
get, that last thing was so shocking. I hear that that book about an
immoral violet, by that new young man--Rondel, isn't it?--is still
having a most enormous success--I know that Barratt's got in a whole
batch of new copies last night--I hear....”
Mrs. Launce was disappointed--Peter could tell well enough. He received
some laudatory reviews, some letters from strangers, some adulation from
people who knew nothing whatever. He did not know what it was exactly
that he had expected--but whatever it was that he wanted, he did not get
it--he was dissatisfied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account