Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
The occurrence of small ramifying tubes in recent and fossil corals,
fish-scales, and bones was long ago pointed out by Quekett[195],
Kölliker[196], Rose[197] and other writers[198]. These narrow tubular
cavities have generally been attributed to the boring action of
some parasitic organism, either a fungus or an alga. In 1876 Duncan
published two important papers[199] dealing with the occurrence of
such tubes in recent corals, as well as in the calcareous skeleton
of _Calceolina_, _Goniophyllum_ and other Palaeozoic, Mesozoic and
Tertiary species of corals. This writer attributed the formation of the
cavities in the case of the fossil species to the action of a fungus
which he named _Palaeachlya perforans_, and considered as very nearly
related to _Achlya penetrans_ found in the “dense sclerenchyma” of
recent corals. In fig. 27 A. is reproduced one of the drawings given
by Rose[200] in his paper published in 1855; it shows a section of a
fish-scale from the Kimeridge clay which has been attacked by a boring
organism. Rose attributes the dichotomously branched canals to some
“infusorial parasite.”
[Illustration: FIG. 27. A, Section of a fish-scale from the Kimeridge
Clay, showing branched canals, made by a boring organism, × 85.
B, Section of a Solen shell, penetrated in all directions by the
boring thallus of _Ostracoblabe_ (a fungus?), × 330. C, Piece of
the thallus of _Ostracoblabe_ isolated by decalcification, × 745.
A, after Rose. B and C, after Bornet and Flahault.]
In the important paper by MM. Bornet and Flahault on perforating algae
a full description is given of various boring forms belonging to the
Chlorophyceae and the Cyanophyceae[201]. The canals which these algae
produce in calcareous shells and other hard substances are of the same
type as those previously described in fossil corals, fish-scales and
bones. In dealing with living perforating Thallophytes the colour and
other cell-contents often enable us to distinguish between algae and
fungi, but in fossil specimens such tests cannot be applied. The fossil
tubular borings may or may not show traces of the transverse septa
and reproductive cells; it is often the case that no trace of the
organism has been left, but only the canals by which it penetrated the
calcareous or bony skeleton. In some of the examples of _Palaeachlya_
figured by Duncan there appear to be numerous spores in some of the
sections, but it is generally a very difficult and often an impossible
task to discriminate between the borings of fungi and algae in fossil
material.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account