Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
No doubt some of the fossils from the Silurian and Cambrian rocks are
true algae, and Nathorst has pointed out that such a species as Hall’s
_Sphenothallus angustifolius_[243] may well be an alga. Additional
examples might be quoted from Bornemann and other writers, but in view
of the attempts which are sometimes made to trace the development of
more recent plants to more than doubtful Lower Palaeozoic Algae, one
must agree with Nathorst’s opinion,—“Je crois que l’on rend un bien
mauvais service à la théorie de l’évolution, en essayant de baser
l’arbre généalogique des algues fossiles sur des corps aussi douteux
que les Bilobites, Crossochorda, Eophyton, etc.[244]”
There are many carbonaceous impressions on rocks of different ages
which it is reasonable to refer to algal origin, and although such
are of little or no botanical value, it may be a convenience to
refer to them under a definite term. The comprehensive generic name
_Algites_[245] has been suggested as a convenient designation for
impressions or casts which are probably those of algae.
[Sidenote: SUPPOSED FOSSIL ALGAE.]
Some of the fossils described by Mr Kidston from British Carboniferous
rocks as probably algae present an undoubted algal appearance, and
might be placed in the genus _Algites_; but in some cases—e.g.
_Chondrites plumosa_[246] Kidst. from the Calciferous Sandstone of
Eskdale, one feels much more doubtful; in this particular instance the
impressions suggest the fine roots of a water-plant.
The statement is occasionally made that the numerous fossil algae
and the absence of higher plants in the older strata justify the
description of the oldest rocks as belonging to the ‘age of algae.’
Such an assertion rests on an unsound basis, and is rather the
expression of what might be expected than what has been proved to
be the case. The oldest plants with which we are at all closely
acquainted are of such a type as to forcibly suggest that in the lowest
fossiliferous rocks we are still very far from the sediments of that
age which witnessed the dawn of plant life.
Many of the obscure markings on rock surfaces which have been referred
to existing genera of algae or described as new genera, are much
too doubtful to be included even under such a comprehensive name as
_Algites_. Space does not admit of further reference to determinations
of this type which abound in palaeontological literature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account