Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
In addition to the occurrence of Diatoms in the various diatomaceous
deposits, their siliceous tests may occasionally be recognised in
argillaceous or other sediments. Shrubsole and Kitton[263] have
described several species of Diatoms from the London Clay of Lower
Eocene age. In many localities in the London basin the clay obtained
from well-sinkings presented the appearance of being dusted with
sulphur-like particles of a dark bronze or golden colour which
glistened in the sunlight. These yellow bodies have been found to
be diatomaceous frustules in which the silica has been replaced by
iron pyrites. The genus _Coscinodiscus_ is one of the commonest forms
recorded from the London Clay[264].
Without further considering individual examples of diatomaceous rocks
we may briefly notice the general facts of the geological history of
the family. As Ehrenberg pointed out several years ago, the Tertiary
and Cretaceous species of diatoms show a very marked resemblance to
living forms. In many cases the species are identical, and the fossil
deposits as a whole seem to differ in no special respect from those now
being built up.
With the exception of two species of Liassic Diatoms, no trustworthy
examples of the Diatomaceae have been found below the Cretaceous
series. The oldest known Diatoms were discovered by Rothpletz[265]
among the fibres of an Upper Lias sponge from Boll in Württemberg.
They occur as small thimble-shaped siliceous tests with coccoliths
and foraminifera in the horny skeleton of _Phymatoderma_, a genus
formerly regarded as an alga. Rothpletz describes two species which he
includes in the genus _Pyxidicula_, _P. bollensis_ and _P. liasica_.
This generic name of Ehrenberg is used by Schütt[266] as a subgenus of
_Stephanopyxis_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account