Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
Schlüter has transferred a supposed Devonian Foraminiferal genus,
_Coelotrochium_[330], to the list of Palaeozoic Siphoneae.
Munier-Chalmas regards some of the fossils described by Saporta under
the name of _Goniolina_[331], and classed among the inflorescences of
pro-angiospermous plants, as examples of Jurassic Siphoneae. The shape
and surface-features of some of the examples of _Goniolina_ suggest a
comparison with Echinoid spines, but the resemblance which many of the
forms in the Sorbonne collection present to large calcareous Siphoneae
is still more striking. A comparison of Saporta’s fig. 5, Pl. xxxiii.
and fig. 4, Pl. xxxii. in volume iv. of the _Flore Jurassique_, with
the figures given by Solms-Laubach[332] and Cramer[333] of species of
_Bornetella_ brings out a close similarity between _Goniolina_ and
recent algae; the chief difference being the greater size of the fossil
forms. The possibility of confounding Echinoid spines with calcareous
Siphoneae is illustrated by Rothpletz[334], who has expressed the
opinion that Gümbel’s _Haploporella fasciculata_ is not an alga but the
spine of a sea-urchin.
Among Cretaceous forms, in addition to _Goniolina_, which passes
upwards from Jurassic rocks, _Triploporella_[335] and other genera have
been recorded.
_Uteria_[336] is an interesting type of Tertiary genera; it occurs
in the form of barrel-shaped rings, which are probably the detached
segments of a form in which the central axial cell was encrusted
with carbonate of lime, but the sporangia and the whorls of branches
differed from those of _Cymopolia_ in being without a calcareous
investment.
_b._ CONFERVOIDEAE.
Without attempting to describe at length the fossil forms referred to
this division of the Chlorophyceae, there is one fossil which deserves
a passing notice. Brongniart in 1828[337] instituted the generic term
_Confervites_ for filamentous fossils resembling recent species of
confervoid algae. Numerous fossils have been referred to this genus
by different authors, but they are for the most part valueless and
need not be further considered. In 1887 Bornemann described some new
forms which he referred to this genus from the Cambrian rocks of
Sardinia. He describes the red marble of San Pietra, near Masne,
as being in places full of the delicate remains of algae having the
form of branched filaments, and appearing in sections of the rock as
white lines on a dark crystalline matrix. In fig. 35, G, one of these
Sardinian specimens is represented. This form is named _Confervites
Chantransioides_[338]; the thallus consists of branched cell-filaments,
having a breadth of 6–7µ, and composed of ovate cells. It is possible
that this is a fragment of a Cambrian alga, but the figures and
descriptions do not afford by any means convincing evidence. From
post-Tertiary beds various genera, such as _Vaucheria_ and others, have
been recorded, but they possess but little botanical value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account