Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 1 : $b [A text-book] for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
Like Liverworts, Mosses have left very few traces of their existence
in plant-bearing rocks. Without the aid of the characteristic
moss-‘fruit’ or sporogonium it is almost impossible to recognise
fossil moss-plant fragments. In species of the tropical genera
_Spiridens_ and _Dawsonia_, e.g. _S. longifolius_[468] Lind. or _D.
superba_[469] Grev. and _D. polytrichoides_[470] R. Br., the plant
reaches a considerable length, and resembles twigs of plants higher in
the scale than the Bryophytes. The finer branches of species of the
extinct genus _Lepidodendron_ are extremely moss-like in appearance.
Again, _Cyathophyllum bulbosum_ Muell[471], with its two kinds of
leaves arranged in rows, is not at all unlike species of _Selaginella_
or the hepatic genus _Gottschea_. It is by no means improbable that
some of the Palaeozoic specimens described as twigs of _Lycopodites_,
_Selaginites_, or _Lepidodendron_, may be portions of mosses. The
fertile branches of _Lycopodium phlegmaria_ in a fossil condition might
be easily mistaken for fragments of a moss. In some conifers with
small and crowded scale-leaves there is a certain resemblance to the
stouter forms of moss stems. Such possible sources of error should be
prominently kept in view when we are considering the value of negative
evidence as regards the geological history of the Musci.
A recent writer[472] on mosses has expressed the opinion that no doubt
the Musci played an exceedingly important rôle in past time. Although
we have no proof that this was so, yet it is far from improbable, and
the absence of fossil mosses must no doubt be attributed in part to
their failure to be preserved in a fossil state.
In the numerous samples of Coal-Measure vegetation preserved in
extraordinary perfection in the calcareous nodules of England, no
certain trace of a moss has so far been discovered. The most delicate
tissue in the larger Palaeozoic plants has often been preserved, and
in view of such possibilities of petrifaction it might appear strange
that if moss-like plants existed no fragments had been preserved.
Their absence is, however, no proof of the non-existence of Palaeozoic
mosses, but it is a fact which certainly tends towards the assumption
that mosses were probably not very abundant in the Coal Period forests.
Epiphytic mosses frequently occur on the stems and leaves of ferns
and other plants in tropical forests. Such small and comparatively
delicate plants would, however, be easily rubbed off or destroyed in
the process of fossilisation, and it is extremely rare to find among
petrified Palaeozoic plants the external features well preserved. It is
probable that the forests extended over low lying and swampy regions,
and that, in part, the trees were rooted in a submerged surface. Under
such conditions of growth there would not be the same abundance of
Bryophytes as in most of our modern forests.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account