Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
There are, however, some difficulties to face in attempting to decipher
the history of the Filicineae as recorded in the earth’s crust. Few
fossil plants are so familiar as the well-preserved carbonaceous
impressions of compound leaves on the shales of our Coal-Measures,
which were referred by older authors to recent genera and species of
ferns and accepted by later writers as undoubted examples of Palaeozoic
ferns. The common belief in the dominance of ferns in Palaeozoic
floras is reflected in the novelist’s description of the Carboniferous
period, “when the forms of plants were few and often of the fern
kind[678].” We now know that very many of these Carboniferous leaves
belonged to plants differing widely in morphological characters from
the modern genera to which they exhibit so deceptive a resemblance.
These pseudo-ferns, recently christened Pteridosperms or seed-bearing
fern-like plants, are dealt with in a later chapter. The discovery
of this extinct group has added enormously to our knowledge of
plant-evolution and at the same time has rendered much more difficult
the task of unravelling the past history of the true ferns. As soon
as it was demonstrated that many familiar Palaeozoic “ferns” are not
ferns, some authors went far towards concluding that however close
might be the agreement between fossil and recent leaves suspicion of
close relationship must be set aside. Like the earlier writers who
described fossils as _lusus naturae_ fashioned by devilish agency
to deceive too credulous man, the discovery of seed-bearing plants
with the foliage of ferns threatened to disturb the mental balance of
palaeobotanists. The fact is, we cannot in some cases determine from
leaf-form alone whether or not a fossil is a true fern; we may, as
Professor Bower[679] suggests, regard all fern-like fossils as ferns
until they are proved to be Pteridosperms, or in a spirit of scientific
scepticism, we may at once admit that many Palaeozoic fern-like
leaves must await further evidence before their true position can be
determined. It is impossible, as Zeiller[680] says, in the present
state of our knowledge to range fern-like Palaeozoic plants in two
groups, one referred to Filicineae and the other to the Pteridosperms.
The following classification of the Filicales is based on that adopted
by Prof. Engler in the latest edition of his _Syllabus_[681] and on the
results of Bower’s[682] excellent work on the spore-bearing members of
recent ferns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account