Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
It is by no means safe to assume that these and such Upper
Carboniferous sporangia as Bower[771] compared with those of
_Todea_ were borne on plants possessing the anatomical characters
of Osmundaceae rather than those of the extinct Palaeozoic family
Botryopterideae. This brings us to the important fact, first pointed
out by Renault, that the Botryopterideae are essentially generalised
ferns exhibiting many points of contact with the Osmundaceae[772].
It is clear that whether or not we are justified in tracing the
Osmundaceae as far back as the Lower Carboniferous period, some of the
characteristics of the family were already foreshadowed in rocks of
this age.
Through a fortunate accident of preservation, unequivocal evidence of
the existence of Osmundaceae in the Palaeozoic era is supplied by the
Russian Upper Permian genera _Zalesskya_ and _Thamnopteris_.
_Zalesskya._
This generic title has been instituted by Kidston and
Gwynne-Vaughan[773] for two Russian stems of Upper Permian age, one
of which was named by Eichwald[774] _Chelepteris gracilis_, but the
probability that the type of the genus _Chelepteris_ is generically
distinct from Eichwald’s species necessitated a new designation for the
Permian fern.
In habit the stem of _Zalesskya_ resembles that of an _Osmunda_ or a
_Todea_, but it differs in the possession of a stele composed of a
continuous cylinder or solid column of xylem surrounded by phloem,
and by the differentiation of the xylem into two concentric zones.
The leaves are represented by petiole-bases only; the sporangia are
unknown. The stem and leaf-base anatomy fully justifies the inclusion
of _Zalesskya_ in the Osmundaceae.
_Zalesskya gracilis_ (Eichwald). Fig. 248.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account