Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geologySeward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Science
Fossil plants, Vol. 2 : $b A text-book for students of botany and geology
Seward, A. C. (Albert Charles)
Paleobotany
In endeavouring to distinguish specifically between fronds showing a
general agreement in habit with _C. denticulata_, special attention
should be paid to venation characters, the shape of the pinnules,
the relation of the two edges of the lamina to one another, and to
the amount of curvature of the whole pinnule. Unless the material is
abundant, it is often impossible to distinguish between characters of
specific value and others which are the expression of differences in
age or of position on a large frond, to say nothing of the well-known
variability which is amply illustrated by recent ferns. It is
remarkable that very few specimens are known which throw any light on
the nature of the fertile pinnae. Fig. 258 represents an impression
from the Inferior Oolite rocks of the Yorkshire coast in which the
exposed upper surface of the pinnules shows a series of parallel ridges
following the course of the lateral veins and no doubt formed by
oblong sori on the lower surface. There can be little doubt that the
specimen figured by Lindley and Hutton and by others as _Pecopteris
undans_[817] is, as Nathorst suggests, a portion of a fertile frond of
_C. denticulata_. A fertile specimen of a frond resembling in habit
_C. denticulata_, which Fontaine has described from the Jurassic
rocks of Oregon as _Danaeopsis Storrsii_[818], exhibits, as that
author points out, a superficial resemblance to the specimen named by
Lindley and Hutton _Pecopteris undans_. There is, however, no adequate
reason for referring the American fragment to the Marattiaceae. In the
absence of sporangia we cannot speak confidently as to the systematic
position of this common type; but there are fairly good grounds for
the assertion that some at least of the fronds described under this
name are those of Osmundaceae. The English specimen shown in fig.
258 is very similar to some Indian fossils figured by Feistmantel
as _Asplenites macrocarpus_[819], which are probably identical with
_Pecopteris australis_ Morris[820], a fern that is indistinguishable
from _Cladophlebis denticulata_. Renault[821] figured a fertile
specimen of the Australian fossil as _Todea australis_, which agrees
very closely with that shown in fig. 258, and the sporangia figured
by the French author are of the Osmundaceous type. Another example
of a fertile specimen is afforded by a Rhaetic fern from Franconia,
_Asplenites ottonis_, which is probably identical with _Alethopteris
Roesserti_ Presl [= _Cladophlebis_ (_Todites_) _Roesserti_], a plant
closely resembling _Cladophlebis denticulata_. Another argument in
favour of including _C. denticulata_ in the Osmundaceae is supplied
by the association of pinnae of this type with the petrified stem of
_Osmundites Dunlopi_ recorded by Kidston and Gwynne-Vaughan.
[Illustration: FIG. 258. Fertile pinnae of _Cladophlebis denticulata_.
(From a Yorkshire specimen in the Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.)]
=Schizaeaceae.=
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account