Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2Tyndall, John
Science
Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2
Tyndall, John
Chemistry; Physics; Science
For these two self-repellent and mutually attractive colours,
substitute in your minds two invisible self-repellent and mutually
attractive fluids, which in ordinary steel are mixed to form a neutral
compound, but which the act of magnetisation separates from each
other, placing the opposite fluids on the opposite face of each
molecule. You have then a perfectly distinct conception of the
celebrated theory of magnetic fluids. The strength of the magnetism
excited is supposed to be proportional to the quantity of neutral
fluid decomposed. According to this theory nothing is actually
transferred from the exciting magnet to the excited steel. The act of
magnetisation consists in the forcible separation of two fluids which
existed in the steel before it was magnetised, but which then
neutralised each other by their coalescence. And if you test your
magnet, after it has excited a hundred pieces of steel, you will find
that it has lost no force--no more, indeed, than I should lose, had my
words such a magnetic influence on your minds as to excite in them a
strong resolve to study natural philosophy. I should rather be the
gainer by my own utterance, and by the reaction of your fervour. The
magnet also is the gainer by the reaction of the body which it
magnetises.
Look now to your excited piece of steel; figure each molecule with its
opposed fluids spread over its opposite faces. How can this state of
things be permanent? The fluids, by hypothesis, attract each other;
what, then, keeps them apart? Why do they not instantly rush together
across the equator of the atom, and thus neutralise each other? To
meet this question philosophers have been obliged to infer the
existence of a special force, which holds the fluids asunder. They
call it _coercive force_; and it is found that those kinds of steel
which offer most resistance to being magnetised--which require the
greatest amount of 'coercion' to tear their fluids asunder--are the
very ones which offer the greatest resistance to the reunion of the
fluids, after they have been once separated. Such kinds of steel are
most suited to the formation of _permanent_ magnets. It is manifest,
indeed, that without coercive force a permanent magnet would not be at
all possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Fragments of Science: A Series of Detached Essays, Addresses, and Reviews. V. 1-2 — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account