Frances Mary Buss and her work for educationRidley, Annie E.
History
Frances Mary Buss and her work for education
Ridley, Annie E.
Buss, Frances Mary, 1827-1894
A selection from these “Notes” is being prepared for the use of
teachers by Miss Toplis, and will shortly be published by Messrs.
Macmillan and Co.
It is easy, after going through these notes, to be sure of the secret of
her great influence. It is teaching that goes straight to the point
because it comes straight from the heart of the teacher, whose happy
pupils had good reason to say, “What before may have been only words to
us then became facts. She was not so much a teacher as an inspiration!”
How these earlier ideals stood the test of time we may read in a record
given a quarter of a century later by the colleague who best knew her
work of “Education as known in the North London Collegiate School for
Girls.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration:
NORTH LONDON COLLEGIATE SCHOOL FOR GIRLS.
]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER IX.
PRACTICAL WORK.
“No one who has been brought into contact with Miss Buss, no one
who has even seen her portrait, can have failed to be struck by
her transparent integrity, her absolute sincerity, her
single-mindedness of purpose. However much one might differ from
her on a question of policy, one felt certain that the judgment
was never warped by personal bias, that it was never prompted by
ambition or jealousy, or any vulgar motive.... As an organizer
she was unrivalled.”—_Journal of Education_, January, 1895.
The summary of Miss Buss’ practical work, for which I am so deeply
indebted to Mrs. Bryant, is best given in her own words, with merely an
interpolation illustrating that law of order on which these schools are
so firmly based.
* * * * *
Mrs. Bryant begins with an important reminder—
“Teachers are not inapt to forget that the most important factor in
education is the personality of the learner. The next most important is
the personality of the teacher. So far as others make our education for
us, the mind of the educator is more important by far than his method.
And this is the more true the greater the teacher.
“Of Frances Mary Buss this was specially true, so much was intuition and
sympathy in the concrete inwoven with her thoughts on the educational
ideal. The ideal of her action was an emanation of her nature as a
whole, not a pure product of thought. She could have told many things
about it, but she could not tell it all. Her vision was wide, but her
wisdom was wider. Hence there never was any danger that her mind would
harden into a net of secondary principles in the solution of any
individual problem. Practical questions were always unique, each one in
itself, to her; and, rapid as she was in action, she could give time to
deliberation and careful thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account