Frances Mary Buss and her work for educationRidley, Annie E.
History
Frances Mary Buss and her work for education
Ridley, Annie E.
Buss, Frances Mary, 1827-1894
This resolution was warmly supported by that unfailing friend of the
higher education of women, Dr. J. G. Fitch, who stood his ground against
the not less warm opposition, headed by Dr. Quain, who, referring to
Mrs. Somerville, asked “if the University was to go for a new charter
just to further the ambition of a few exceptional women?” Dr. Gibson,
also in opposition, urged that a woman could not take up a University
course without detracting from her other powers, for, as woman was
differently organized, it was necessary to give her a different
education; and he asked “if the University was to direct its work by
general wants, or by exceptional wants—the wants of a few masculine
women?”
From the fact that many of Miss Buss’ pupils were resident in London, it
followed that most of them were likely to avail themselves of the
facilities of the London University, even apart from the fact that
London was the first to grant degrees, an event of great excitement to
all women, of which Miss Buss writes in 1878—
“The great thing of last week is the opening of the examinations
and degrees of London University to women! An immense
concession, and one which must be followed in time by the older
universities.
“It is just fifteen years ago since the agitation began about
opening the local examinations, and now, I suppose, the cause is
won along the whole line.”
In a “Note on the Origin and History of the University of London”
(_University Calendar_), we find this record—
“The experiment of offering encouragement for women to pursue a
course of academic education, was at first tried under
limitations which somewhat impeded its success. Under the powers
given in the Charter of 1867, women were not rendered admissible
to the ordinary examinations, but two forms of certificate were
offered to female students—the one general, and the other of
higher proficiency. In the scheme for both examinations,
prominence was given to those subjects which it was presumed
that women and their teachers would prefer. But the number
availing themselves of this privilege was small, and the
privilege itself was not highly valued. Moreover, it was found
that the chief distinctions attained by women in these
examinations were not gained in the special subjects, but in the
classical languages and in science. It was urged by the teachers
that women did not desire a scheme of instruction exclusively
devised for their use, but would prefer to have access to the
ordinary degrees and honours, and to be subject to the same
tests of qualification which were imposed on other students.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account