It now remains that we discourse a little of those Magistrates, which were commonly called _Peers_ of _France_; whereof we can find no Records or Monuments, tho' our Endeavours have not been wanting. For among so great a Number of Books, as are called Chronicles and Annals of _Francogallia_, not one affords us any probable Account of this Institution. For what _Gaguinus_, and _Paulus AEmilius_ (who was not so much an Historian of _French_ Affairs, as of the _Pope's_) and other common Writers do affirm, to wit, That those Magistrates were instituted by _Pipin_ or _Charlemagn_, appears plainly to be absurd; because not one of all the _German_ Historians, who wrote during the Reigns of those Kings, or for some Time after, makes the least Mention of those Magistrates. _Aimoinus_ himself who wrote a History of the Military Atchievements and Institutions of the _Franks_, down to the Reign of _Lewis the Pious_, and the _Appendix_, which reaches as far as the Time of _Lewis the Younger_, being the 37th King, speak not one Word of these _Peers_ in any Place of their Histories; so that till I am better inform'd, I must concur in Opinion with _Gervase_ of _Tilbury_, who (as _Gaguinus_ says in the Book which he wrote to the Emperor _Otho_ the IVth, _de otiis imperialibus_) affirms. That this Institution is first owing to King _Arthur_ of _Britain_, who ruled some time in Part of _France_. For I suppose the Original of that Institution to be this; that as in the _Feudal_ Law such are called, _Pares curie beneficiari_, i. e. _equal Tenants by Homage of the Court_, or _Clientes [Greek: omotimoi], Clients of like holding_, or _Convassilli, Fellow Vassals_, who hold their _Fiefs_ and _Benefices_ from one and the same _Lord_ and _Patron_; and upon that Account are bound to him in _Fealty_ and Obedience: just so King _Arthur_ having acquired a new Principality, selected _twelve great Men_, to whom he distributed the several Parts and _Satrapies_ of his Kingdom, whole Assistance and Advice he made use of in the Administration of the Government. For I cannot approve of their Judgment, who write, that they were called _Peers_, because they were _Pares Regi_, the _King's Equals_; since their Parity his no Relation to the _Regal Dignity_, but only to that Authority and Dignity they had agreed should be common among them. Their Names were these, the _Dukes of Burgundy, Normandy_, and _Aquitain_; the _Counts_ of _Flanders, Tholouse_, and _Champagne_; the _Archbishops_ of _Rheims, Laon_, and _Langres_; the _Bishops_ of _Beauvais, Noyon_, and _Chalons_. And as the _Pares Curtis_, or _Curie_, in the _Feudal_ Law, can neither be created, but by the Consent of the Fraternity; nor _abdicated_, but by Tryal before their Colleagues; nor _impeach'd_ before any other Court of Judicature; so these _Peers_ were not bound by any judgment or Sentence, but that of the _Parliament_, that is, of this imaginary Council; nor could be _elected_ into the _Society_, or _ejected_ out of