Fray Luis de León: A Biographical FragmentFitzmaurice-Kelly, James
History
Fray Luis de León: A Biographical Fragment
Fitzmaurice-Kelly, James
León, Luis de, 1527-1591
brands Diego de Zúñiga as a deliberate perjurer, 57;
his criticism on Zúñiga's book, 60;
his counsel, Dr. Ortiz de Funes, 65;
his skill in drawing up his own defence, 65;
he is told to choose two _patronos_ from four names unknown to
him, 66;
requests that he be given Sebastian Perez as _patrono_, 66;
suggests that Dr. Cáncer or Hernando del Castillo may be appointed
with Perez, 66;
asks that Castillo's name be removed from the list of
_patronos_, 67;
threatens to appeal to the Inquisitor-General against the enforced
choosing of unknown _patronos_, 67;
decides to accept as _patronos_ Fray Mancio de _Corpus
Christi_ and either Medina or Dr. Cáncer, 68;
Mancio is appointed _patrono_ and makes a report favourable to
him, 69;
all information of this is withheld from him, 69;
he protests against his papers being entrusted to Mancio, 69;
his suspicions and distrust of Mancio, 69-71;
he becomes reconciled with Mancio, 72;
loses judicial favour owing to his vacillations over Mancio, 73;
his demeanour in court, 74;
his portrait by Pacheco, 79;
his want of humour, 80;
his gift of sarcasm, 80;
his versatility, 81; his conservatism, 81;
his teachers, 81;
his books, 81, 82;
his knowledge of Italian, 83;
his curiosity about astrology, 84, 85;
he urges the Court to prosecute Castro for perjury, 86;
declares that his detention is illegal and demands compensation for
it, 86;
his health declines and his irritability increases, 87;
he is blamed by Castillo for teaching erroneous doctrine, 89;
his moods of depression, 89;
Menchaca, Álava, Tello Maldonado, and Albornoz recommend that he be
tortured, 90;
a more lenient view is adopted by Guijano de Mercado and Frechilla,
91;
the Supreme Inquisition brushes aside the views of both parties, 91;
he is publicly reprimanded by order of the Supreme Inquisition and
acquitted, 92;
his Spanish version of the _Song of Solomon_ is confiscated,
92;
he asks for an official certificate of acquittal and for arrears of
salary as regards his chair, 92;
his applications are granted but their fulfilment delayed, 92;
his return to Salamanca, 145;
he meets the _Claustro_ of the University, 146;
renounces all claim to his Chair so long as it is occupied by
Castillo, 146;
creation of a provisional new chair for him by the _Claustro_,
147;
he lectures in his new chair January 29, 1577, 147;
his famous alleged phrase _Dicebamus hesterna die_, 147-150;
difficulties about his lecture-hours, 151;
he presents himself as a candidate for the Chair of Moral
Philosophy, 152;
is strenuously opposed by Zumel, 152;
defeats Zumel by a majority of seventy-nine votes, 153;
takes the degree of M.A., 153;
is appointed member of the committee for the reform of the calendar,
153;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account