Free Opinions, Freely Expressed on Certain Phases of Modern Social Life and ConductCorelli, Marie
Religion
Free Opinions, Freely Expressed on Certain Phases of Modern Social Life and Conduct
Corelli, Marie
English essays -- 20th century; Great Britain -- Social life and customs -- 20th century
National education, progressing steadily for years, has taught the
Public to make up its own mind more quickly than ever it did before, as
regards the books it reads. It will take what it wants and leave the
rest; and the Press can neither persuade it nor repel it against its
own inclination. So that the author in these days has more difficulties
and responsibilities than in the past. He has to fight his battle
alone. He has many more rivals to compete with, and many more readers
to please. And the Press cannot help him. The Press may recommend, may
even “boom” his work; but several instances have occurred lately where
such recommendation has not been accepted. For, sometimes the Public
fight shy of a “boom.” They think it has been worked up by the author’s
friends, and they are not always mistaken. And they silently express
the fact that they are quite capable of choosing the books they wish
to read, without advice or assistance. This being the case, the Press
is beginning to leave books and authors alone to shift for themselves
as best they may, and is turning to other pastime. Nations, peoples,
governments! These are the great footballs it occasionally kicks in
the struggle for journalistic pre-eminence. And I hope I shall not be
misunderstood if I venture to say that it is a somewhat dangerous game!
Because, however powerful the Press may be, it is not the People. It is
the printed opinion of certain editors and their staff. The People are
outside it altogether. And if some one on the Press insults a monarch
or a nation, that insult should not be taken as a People’s insult. It
is the insult of the editor or proprietor who deliberately allows it to
be printed in the particular journal he controls.
It is a thousand pities, for example, that a section of the lower
_boulevard_ press in Paris should be accepted in any quarter, as being
representative of the feeling of the whole French people. When flippant
and irresponsible newspaper scribes resort to calumny for the sake
of notoriety, they prove themselves unworthy to be trusted with the
Power of the Pen. In any case it can only be a God-forsaken creature
who seeks to earn his living by scurrility. Such an one may excite
individual contempt, but does not merit the notice of a great nation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account