This fawning of dukes and boyars on the Great Cham brought no good to
the rustic; who might see his patch of rye trodden down, his homestead
fired, and his village cross profaned by gangs of marauding horse.
Even when a Tartar khan set up his flag on some river bank, as at
Kazan, in some mountain gorge, as at Bakchi Serai, he was still a
nomad and a rider, with his natural seat in the saddle and his natural
home in the tent. A little provocation stirred his blood, and when his
feet were in the stirrups, it was not easy for shepherds and villagers
to turn his lance. A cloud of fire went with him; a trail of smoke and
embers lay behind him. No man could be sure of reaping what he sowed;
for an angry word, an insolent gesture of his duke, might bring that
fiery whirlwind of the Tartar horse upon his crops. What could he do,
except run away? When year by year this ruin fell upon him, he left
his cabin and his field; working a little here, and begging a little
there; but never striking root into the soil. Now he was a pilgrim,
then a shepherd, oftener still a tramp. To pass more easily to and
fro, he donned the Tartar dress; a sheep-skin robe and cap; the robe
caught in at the waist by a belt, and made to turn, so that the wool
could be worn outwardly by day and inwardly by night. In self-defense
he picked up Tartar words, and passed, where he could pass, for one of
the conquering race.
Why should he plough his land for other men to spoil? While he was
watching his corn grow ripe, the khan of Crim Tartary, stung by some
insult from the duke, might spur out rapidly from his luxurious camp
at Bakchi Serai, and, sweeping through the plains from Perekop to
Moscow, waste his fields with fire.
Like causes produce like effects. Nomadic lords produce nomadic
slaves. The Russian peasant became a vagabond, just as the Syrian
fellah becomes a vagabond, when from year to year his crops have been
plundered by the Bedouin tribes.
When Ivan the Fourth, having learned from the Tartar Begs how to rule
and fight, broke up the khanates of Kazan and Astrakhan, and ventured
to defy the lord of Bakchi Serai, he found himself an independent
prince at the head of a country, rich in soil, in capital, and in
labor, but with fields deserted, villages destroyed, populations
scattered, and public roads unsafe. The land was not unpeopled; but
the peasants had lost their sense of home, and the mujiks wandered
from town to town. Labor was dear in one place, worthless in another.
Half the land, even in the richer provinces, lay waste; and every year
some district was scourged by famine, and by the epidemics which
follow in the wake of famine. How were the peasants to be "fixed" upon
the land?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account