[46] Saint-Simon again and again protests against revolution, _vide_ “Catéchisme des Industriels” (ed. 1832), pp. 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 69, 70. [47] _Vide_ “Catéchisme des Industriels” (ed. 1832), pp. 38, 44, 62, 63, 74, 75. [48] _Vide_ Kaufmann’s “Socialism,” p. 115. [49] “Political Economy,” bk. ii. chap. xiii. sec. 1. [50] _Loc. cit._ bk. ii. chap. 1. sec. 3. [51] Quoted by A. J. Booth. [52] _Vide_ “Catéchisme des Industriels,” p. 2. [53] Reybaud, vol. i. pp. 82, 83. [54] Taken from Reybaud, _loc. cit._ vol. i. pp. 105-7. The translation is abridged in places. [55] _i.e._ one unit—man-woman. [56] Perhaps there is no better authority than Louis Blanc concerning the activity of the Saint-Simonians at this time. Cf. his “Histoire de Dix Ans,” tome vii. ch. xxv. (ed. Bruxelles, 1843-44). [57] His principal work is “De L’Humanité,” published in 1840. [58] Pages 102, 103. [59] Quoted by Booth. [60] Ibid. [61] Quoted by Booth, p. 170. [62] Isaiah ii. 4. [63] _Vide_ Lorenz von Stein, “Geschichte der Socialen Bewegung in Frankreich” (Leipzig, 1850), Bd. ii. SS. 226, 227. The translation is abridged and is rather free in places. [64] Bd. ii. S. 228. [65] That is, of so much importance to one writing or studying the history of social movements. [66] In 1808. [67] _Vide_ Introduction to the “Théorie,” tome i. of Œuvres Complètes. [68] _Vide_ Preface of editors to second edition (Paris, 1841). [69] Tomes ii.-v. of Œuvres Complètes (1841-43). [70] _Vide_ “Théorie des Quatre Mouvements,” Œuvres, tome i. p. 50. These phases are subdivided into thirty-two periods, of which a table accompanies p. 52. [71] He seems finally to have been inclined to believe that they were so. [72] Third edition, as vol. vi. of Collected Works (Paris, 1848). [73] _Vide_ Fourier’s Œuvres, tome ii. pp. 142-147, and references there given. Lorenz von Stein sets a high value on the philosophical value of this classification, as compared with similar efforts of Pythagoras and Bossuet. Although appreciative, he criticises Fourier vigorously, and shows the contradictions involved in his classification (_vide_ Stein, “Sociale Bewegung,” Bd. ii. SS. 276-285). [74] Always thus designated by Fourier. He attaches such a reproachful meaning to it that the word has an ugly sound to one immediately after reading his works. [75] _Vide_ “Fourier et son Système,” par Madame Gatti de Gammond (3d ed. 1839), p. 86. [76] “Vices de Nos Procédés Industriels” (1824; 2d ed., with the title “Aperçus sur les Procédés Industriels,” 1840) and “Nouvelles Transactions Sociales, Religieuses et Politiques de Virtomnius” (1832). [77] “Fourier et son Système” (1st ed. 1838; 3d ed. 1839, pp. 384). Madame de Gammond modifies Fourier’s views concerning the relations of the sexes in her presentation, as would naturally be expected of a lady of culture. [78] Wrote “Paroles de Providence” (1835). [79] “Fourier, Sa Vie et sa Théorie” (5th ed. 1872).