French and German Socialism in Modern TimesEly, Richard T. (Richard Theodore)
History
French and German Socialism in Modern Times
Ely, Richard T. (Richard Theodore)
Socialism -- France; Socialism -- Germany
[108] “Droit au Travail” (Paris, 1849), pp. 65-67; “Organisation du
Travail,” pp. 18, 19.
[109] Ibid. pp. 13, 14, 17, 18, 199.
[110] Ibid. p. 71.
[111] Article 3 on p. 120 of “Organisation du Travail.”
[112] “Organisation du Travail,” pp. 72, 114, 120.
[113] _Loc. cit._ pp. 18, 19.
[114] “We then that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the
weak.”—Rom. xv. 1.
[115] “Histoire de la Révolution de 1848,” vol. i. pp. 147, 148.
[116] “Organisation du Travail,” p. 72.
[117] Cf. _loc. cit._ pp. 72, 73, 77, 187, 188, 195, 196, 207, 208, _et
passim_.
[118] Quoted from Sainte-Beuve’s “P.-J. Proudhon, Sa Vie et sa
Correspondance” (1872), by H. Baudrillart, in his article on Proudhon in
the _Revue des deux Mondes_, 1873.
[119] New edition (Paris, 1873, tome i.) of “Œuvres Complètes.”
[120] Preface to “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” p. 5.
[121] Chap. iv. 2d Proposition. I do not mean to assert positively that
Marx borrowed his ideas from Proudhon. He was more indebted to Rodbertus,
who, contemporaneously with Proudhon, but probably independently of him,
was carrying on similar investigation and arriving at similar results. It
is, however, true that Proudhon was the first of the three to publish an
extensive presentation of his ideas.
[122] Vols. iv. and v. of “Œuvres Complètes.”
[123] Details given in “Œuvres Complètes,” vol. vii. pp. 263-313.
[124] New edition (Paris, 1864) of “Œuvres Complètes,” tome vii.
[125] “Œuvres Complètes,” vols. xxi.-xxvi.
[126] The formula of Roman law is “Res nullius cedit primo occupanti.”
[127] “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” pp. 133-137.
[128] “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” p. 204; cf. pp. 205, 206.
[129] Henry George and others might get some useful hints from him.
[130] “Œuvres Complètes,” tome i. pp. 214, 216, 217.
[131] “Œuvres Complètes,” tome vii. p. 271.
[132] Ibid. p. 290.
[133] This name is frequently given to Proudhon’s plans by the socialists.
[134] “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” chap. v. 2e partie, sec. 2.
[135] “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” chap. v. 2e partie, sec. 3. Cf. also
his speech in the National Assembly on 31st of July, 1848, in “Œuvres,”
vol. vii. pp. 268, 269.
[136] Ibid. chap. iv. 5e “Prop. et Appendice.”
[137] “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” p. 157.
[138] “Qu’est-ce que la Propriété?” pp. 222-224.
[139] “Œuvres Complètes,” tome i. pp. 224, 225.
[140] Bd. i. S. 42.
[141] _Fortnightly Review_, May, 1878.
[142] “Exposé des Écoles Socialistes Françaises,” par B. Malon (2d ed.
Paris, 1872). “Avant-Propos,” p. iii.
[143] Frederic Harrison, in article in _Fortnightly Review_, already
referred to.
[144] For this, as well as a few other facts, I am indebted to an article
on “French Socialists” which appeared in the weekly edition of the
_London Times_, March 30, 1883.
[145] _Vide_ B. Malon’s “Exposé,” etc., p. 230.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account