_Loxosomatoides_[BB] (fig. 34), the Indian entoproctous genus found in
brackish water, has not as yet been obtained from the open sea, but has
recently been introduced, apparently from a tidal creek, into isolated
ponds of brackish water at Port Canning. It is easily recognized by the
chitinous shield attached to the ventral (posterior) surface.
[Footnote BB: Annandale, Rec. Ind. Mus. ii, p. 14 (1908).]
[Illustration: Fig. 34.--_Loxosomatoides colonialis_, Annandale.
A and B, a single individual of form A, as seen (A) in lateral, and (B)
in ventral view; C, outline of a similar individual with the tentacles
retracted, as seen from in front (dorsal view); D, ventral view of an
individual and bud of form B. All the figures are from the type
specimens and are multiplied by about 70.]
II.
HISTORY OF THE STUDY OF THE FRESHWATER POLYZOA.
The naturalists of the eighteenth century were acquainted with more than
one species of freshwater polyzoon, but they did not distinguish these
species from the hydroids. Trembley discovered _Cristatella_, which he
called "Polype à Panache," in 1741, and Linné described a species of
_Plumatella_ under the name _Tubipora repens_ in 1758, while ten years
later Pallas gave a much fuller description (under the name _Tubularia
fungosa_) of the form now known as _Plumatella fungosa_ or _P. repens_
var. _fungosa_. Although Trembley, Baker, and other early writers on the
fauna of fresh water published valuable biological notes, the first
really important work of a comprehensive nature was that of Dumortier
and van Beneden, published in 1848. All previous memoirs were, however,
superseded by Allman's Monograph of the Fresh-Water Polyzoa, which was
issued in 1857, and this memoir remains in certain respects the most
satisfactory that has yet been produced. In 1885 Jullien published a
revision of the phylactolæmata and freshwater ctenostomes which is
unfortunately vitiated by some curious lapses in observation, but it is
to Jullien that the recognition of the proper position of _Hislopia_ is
due. The next comprehensive monograph was that of Kraepelin, which
appeared in two parts (1887 and 1892) in the Abhandlungen des Naturwiss.
Vereins of Hamburg. In its detailed information and carefully executed
histological plates this work is superior to any that preceded it or has
since appeared, but the system of classification adopted is perhaps less
liable to criticism than that followed by Braem in his "Untersuchungen,"
published in the Bibliotheca Zoologica in 1888.
During the second half of the nineteenth century and the first decade of
the twentieth several authors wrote important works on the embryology
and anatomy of the phylactolæmata, notably Kraepelin, Braem, and Oka;
but as yet the ctenostomes of fresh water have received comparatively
little attention from anything but a systematic point of view.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account