Froebel as a pioneer in modern psychologyMurray, E. R. (Elsie Riach)
Science
Froebel as a pioneer in modern psychology
Murray, E. R. (Elsie Riach)
Fröbel, Friedrich, 1782-1852; Psychology
“Every age, even the age of childhood, has something to cherish
that is plain, and from doing so no exemption can be procured;
it has therefore its duties. Happy is it for a child if he
be led to deal with them adequately, and for the present
unconsciously. Duties are not burdens.… Fulfilment of duty
strengthens body and mind, and the consciousness of duty done
gives independence; even a child feels this. See, Mother, how
happy your child is in feeling he has done his small duties. He
already feels his kinship with you thereby.”--_M., p. 174._
There is never a separation between Morality and Religion:
“Religion without industry, without work, is liable to be lost
in empty dreams, worthless visions, idle fancies. Similarly,
work or industry without religion degrades man into a beast
of burden, a machine. Work and religion must be simultaneous;
for God, the Eternal has been creating from all eternity.…
Where religion, industry and self-control, the truly undivided
trinity rule, there indeed is heaven upon earth.”--_E., p. 35._
There is only one other instinct mentioned by Froebel, and that is the
parental, or, rather, the maternal instinct. He is eager that this
should be recognized as an instinct, but he is equally eager that, like
other human instincts, its action should be determined by intelligence.
In describing the “Plan” for his Kindergarten, Froebel pleads for more
careful observation of the child and his relationships, and says that
“thereby”:
“Deeper insight will be gained into the meaning and importance
of the child’s actions and outward manifestations and
also into the way of dealing with children which has been
evolved naturally by the mother led by her pure maternal
instinct.”--_L., p. 248._
As to the early beginnings of the instinct in the little girl we can find
just a few references, sufficient to show that it did not pass unnoticed,
and it seems here legitimate to say that “the girl anticipates her
destiny,” as Froebel does in speaking of doll-play, though certainly this
does not cover all such play:
“The joy of the child in its doll has a far deeper human
foundation than is generally supposed--a foundation by no
means resting merely in the external resemblance … the girl
anticipates her destiny--to foster Nature and life.”--_P., p.
93._
The boy’s destiny is “to penetrate and rule Nature,” so in the “Mother
Songs” Froebel describes how the boy is “cowering that no sign of life
in the chicken family may escape him, while the girl starts up, _all her
care of things stirred_, in order to beckon or call the hen or cock not
to forget their chickens.”--_M., p. 143._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account