From Crow-Scaring to Westminster: An AutobiographyEdwards, George, Sir
History
From Crow-Scaring to Westminster: An Autobiography
Edwards, George, Sir
George Edwards, 1850-1933
In spite of this the question was put, and there voted for the amendment
Messrs. H. A. Day, W. Codling, M. Berry and myself.
For the resolution Messrs. G. Nicholls, R. Winfrey, J. Arnett, T. Giles,
A. P. Petch and J. Stibbons. The resolution was carried and I was
instructed to take steps to carry this out. I then gave the result of
the second ballot:--
For continuing the strike 1,102
Against continuing the strike 1,053
-----
Majority for standing out 49
Thus the strike that had lasted nearly eight months was brought to a
close, not because the funds of the Union were exhausted, but because
the majority of the committee honestly believed that it was to the
interest of the men and the Union that it should be closed.
I and those of the committee who were in the minority thought it was a
grave mistake, and I think so to-day.
The troubles of the Union, however, were only just beginning.
Mr. Day wrote to the press condemning the action of the committee and
publicly advised the members to take the matter into their own hands by
demanding a General Council Meeting as per Rule 3, Section 3. This
brought to me scores of telegrams and letters demanding that I should
call a General Meeting to undo what the Executive had done. Of the many
letters I received the following is a specimen, and shows the feeling
that existed amongst the members on the whole matter:--
KENNINGHALL,
_January 6, 1911_.
DEAR MR. EDWARDS,
I have read in the press with deep regret of the way in which the
committee have stopped the St. Faith's strike. If it is true that
the farmers at St. Faith's have said, and I have it from good
authority, that they were prepared to give the 1s. per week, but
did not like giving the three hours on the Saturday, in the face of
this how is it they were willing to send the men back without even
asking for the 1s. or even a promise that it should be given on a
certain date or when the men could work the full hours? And,
further, they are sending the men back against the express wish of
the whole Union. I certainly thought the funds of the Union
belonged to the members and that they had power to say how their
money should be spent and not the E.C.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account