From Crow-Scaring to Westminster: An AutobiographyEdwards, George, Sir
History
From Crow-Scaring to Westminster: An Autobiography
Edwards, George, Sir
George Edwards, 1850-1933
their prospective candidate to contest the Division at the General
Election. I thanked them for their kind invitation and accepted it. On
the Monday a full report of my speech and my adoption appeared in the
press. I was, however, to have showered on my head storms of abuse. The
writer of current topics in the _Eastern Daily Press_ was particularly
severe, and other writers in the press in their anxiety to discredit me
did not hesitate to stoop to misinterpret my words. While I deeply
resented the misinterpretation of words and claimed that the services I
had rendered to my country during the war were sufficient answer to my
critics and that I was anything but disloyal to my country, I also
claimed that I had a right to hold my own views on what I thought was
the best method of bringing this terrible conflict to an end. My
opponents made as much political capital out of it as they could, but I
was satisfied that I was right, if not for any other reason, for the
sake of humanity. On November 20, 1918, at a special meeting of the
South Norfolk Divisional Labour Party I was formally adopted as their
candidate, and the following is a press report of my address.
Mr. Edwards, who was loudly cheered, said he asked the electors to
keep before their minds not persons but principles. He somewhat
regretted that Mr. Soames had withdrawn, because he was certain
that however much they might differ, he was a perfect gentleman,
and they would have carried through the contest in a way that would
have been creditable to them. Whoever might be their opponents, so
far as he was concerned, he intended to act in such a way, whatever
the result, that he should not have to look back with any regrets
to the contest. He would give his opponents credit for being honest
in their intentions. If he was reviled he would not revile again,
but if character was attacked he would be compelled to defend
character and the position he took up. No one regretted more than
the Labour Party that the election had been brought upon them. The
Government, however, had determined to go to the country, and the
Labour Party took up the gauntlet and would fight for the
principles they held dear. The Government said they wanted a
mandate. What greater mandate could they have than a united people
behind them, and they had a united country to back them up in their
peace terms. What was wanted was a just and permanent peace, with
no vindictiveness, and the Labour Party held the view that there
was no safeguard for a permanent peace except on the grounds laid
down by President Wilson. The Labour Party was going in for a
League of Nations, for such a league laid down on the President's
principles would mean a permanent peace, and bring about universal
brotherhood. They meant by a League of Nations a league which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account