From Crow-Scaring to Westminster: An AutobiographyEdwards, George, Sir
History
From Crow-Scaring to Westminster: An Autobiography
Edwards, George, Sir
George Edwards, 1850-1933
authorities which had contracts in hand found that the men had to
stand idle for the lack of raw material. I was very much interested
in a speech made by the Minister of Health in regard to the
agricultural industry. I have a knowledge of this industry. I was
engaged in it for many years, and I remember the time when there
were 950,000 agricultural labourers and others employed on the
land. At the present time there are only 550,000 so employed, and
yet we have in my own county to-day 500 agricultural labourers
standing by for want of work! I heard a question asked of the
Minister of Health why this was so. I think I can give the reply.
It is largely due to the gambling which is now going on in land. It
is also due, in part, to the bad farming which has been prevalent
for many years. That is responsible for the great decrease in the
number of men employed on the land. We ask the Government, as far
as the land question is concerned, to do what they did during the
war, namely to put into force the compulsory clauses of the Defence
of the Realm Act. We have to-day, I believe, between 2,000,000 and
3,000,000 acres of land out of cultivation. We were told the other
day that there were 800,000 acres less under wheat this year, and I
believe I am correct in saying that since the Armistice 80,000
acres of land have gone out of cultivation that were brought under
cultivation during the war. Why do not the Government put into
force the compulsory clauses, and compel those who call the land
theirs to keep it in cultivation? Something has been said about
afforestation. In my own county we have something like 3,000 acres
of land that is useful for that purpose. I do not say, with my
knowledge of agriculture, that all the land is suitable for
producing food; I know it is not; but it will produce something
that the nation wants. That land is now lying derelict. It is only
used as rabbit warrens, because it pays the landlord better to keep
it for game preserving than it does to produce things that we want.
If the Government would step in, and I appeal to them to do so,
they could at once set to work most of this unskilled labour--we
are told that it would require no skill--if they would insist upon
the use of this land for this purpose. I know that it is suitable
for the production of wood, which is greatly needed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account