From the Black Mountain to Waziristan: Being an account of the border countries and the more turbulent of the tribes controlled by the north-west frontier province, and of our military relations with them in the pastWylly, H. C. (Harold Carmichael)
History
From the Black Mountain to Waziristan: Being an account of the border countries and the more turbulent of the tribes controlled by the north-west frontier province, and of our military relations with them in the past
_Hamsaya: Sheikhan._—These are believed to have been originally Wazirs;
they are Sunnis and Samil in politics. Their possessions form a compact
tract, extending from the Mastura River on the north to the Khanki on
the south, and from Khangabur on the west to Talai on the border of the
Kohat district on the east. They trade but little, and come down to the
neighbourhood of Kohat to pasture their flocks in the winter. They can
muster from 2750–3000 fighting men of no great repute for courage, but
are a clan of some importance and not easy to control, though
susceptible to blockade.
As regards the question of the southern boundaries of the Orakzai
territory, it may be mentioned that as far back as 1865, the Rabia Khel
division of the Ismailzai clan formally acknowledged that the crest of
the Samana Range was the northern boundary of British territory; but the
strip of country in question does not then appear to have been marked on
our maps as British, although it was assessed as such, and was always
acknowledged by the clans as being within our borders. It was not,
however, until 1889 that the Government of India agreed to the proposals
of the Punjab Government that “the country up to the _foot_ of the
Samana Range should be declared to be British territory and dealt with
accordingly,” and not until two years later that posts were established
upon the Samana Range itself.
This chapter may fittingly be closed by a brief account of the
circumstances under which certain Orakzai clans and divisions petitioned
to be taken under British administration, and of the decision which was
then come to on the matter.
As has already been mentioned, the Orakzai tribe is partly Sunni and
partly Shiah by persuasion, the Sunnis predominating, and between these
two religious communities there exists a long-standing and bitter
animosity. In the summer of 1894 the Bar Muhammad Khel division of the
Muhammad Khel clan of Orakzais made a request through the Assistant
Political Officer, Kohat, that they might be allowed to come under
British rule, on the grounds that they could not much longer defend
themselves against their Sunni fellow-tribesmen, as they found
themselves cut off from local supplies of arms and ammunition by the
influence of Sunni mullahs. To some of the frontier officials the idea
of such voluntary annexation had a good deal to recommend it, but the
Government of India declined to meet the desire of the division
concerned that they or their country should be put under the control or
the protection of the British Government.
[Sidenote: Shiah and Sunni Animosity]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account