From the Earth to the moon; and, round the moonVerne, Jules
Science
From the Earth to the moon; and, round the moon
Verne, Jules
Manned space flight -- Fiction; Moon -- Fiction; Science fiction; Space flight to the moon -- Fiction; Space ships -- Fiction
“Then why did you hide them?”
“A joke, my worthy president, a simple joke, which has proved a
miserable failure. I wanted to set them free on the lunar continent,
without saying anything. Oh, what would have been your amazement on
seeing these earthly-winged animals pecking in your lunar fields!”
“You rascal, you unmitigated rascal,” replied Barbicane, “you do not
want oxygen to mount to the head. You are always what we were under the
influence of the gas; you are always foolish!”
“Ah, who says that we were not wise then?” replied Michel Ardan.
After this philosophical reflection, the three friends set about
restoring the order of the projectile. Chickens and cock were
reinstated in their coop. But while proceeding with this operation,
Barbicane and his two companions had a most desired perception of a new
phenomenon. From the moment of leaving the earth, their own weight,
that of the projectile, and the objects it enclosed, had been subject
to an increasing diminution. If they could not prove this loss of the
projectile, a moment would arrive when it would be sensibly felt upon
themselves and the utensils and instruments they used.
It is needless to say that a scale would not show this loss; for the
weight destined to weight the object would have lost exactly as much as
the object itself; but a spring steelyard for example, the tension of
which was independent of the attraction, would have given a just
estimate of this loss.
We know that the attraction, otherwise called the weight, is in
proportion to the densities of the bodies, and inversely as the squares
of the distances. Hence this effect: If the earth had been alone in
space, if the other celestial bodies had been suddenly annihilated, the
projectile, according to Newton’s laws, would weigh less as it got
farther from the earth, but without ever losing its weight entirely,
for the terrestrial attraction would always have made itself felt, at
whatever distance.
But, in reality, a time must come when the projectile would no longer
be subject to the law of weight, after allowing for the other celestial
bodies whose effect could not be set down as zero. Indeed, the
projectile’s course was being traced between the earth and the moon. As
it distanced the earth, the terrestrial attraction diminished: but the
lunar attraction rose in proportion. There must come a point where
these two attractions would neutralize each other: the projectile would
possess weight no longer. If the moon’s and the earth’s densities had
been equal, this point would have been at an equal distance between the
two orbs. But taking the different densities into consideration, it was
easy to reckon that this point would be situated at 47/60ths of the
whole journey, _i.e._, at 78,514 leagues from the earth. At this point,
a body having no principle of speed or displacement in itself, would
remain immovable forever, being attracted equally by both orbs, and not
being drawn more toward one than toward the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account