From the Earth to the moon; and, round the moonVerne, Jules
Science
From the Earth to the moon; and, round the moon
Verne, Jules
Manned space flight -- Fiction; Moon -- Fiction; Science fiction; Space flight to the moon -- Fiction; Space ships -- Fiction
“For the reason that ‘he is always brave who never suspects danger.’ I
know nothing, it is true; but it is precisely my very weakness which
constitutes my strength.”
“Your weakness amounts to folly,” retorted the unknown in a passion.
“All the better,” replied our Frenchman, “if it carries me up to the
moon.”
Barbicane and his colleagues devoured with their eyes the intruder who
had so boldly placed himself in antagonism to their enterprise. Nobody
knew him, and the president, uneasy as to the result of so free a
discussion, watched his new friend with some anxiety. The meeting began
to be somewhat fidgety also, for the contest directed their attention
to the dangers, if not the actual impossibilities, of the proposed
expedition.
“Sir,” replied Ardan’s antagonist, “there are many and incontrovertible
reasons which prove the absence of an atmosphere in the moon. I might
say that, _a priori_, if one ever did exist, it must have been absorbed
by the earth; but I prefer to bring forward indisputable facts.”
“Bring them forward then, sir, as many as you please.”
“You know,” said the stranger, “that when any luminous rays cross a
medium such as the air, they are deflected out of the straight line; in
other words, they undergo refraction. Well! When stars are occulted by
the moon, their rays, on grazing the edge of her disc, exhibit not the
least deviation, nor offer the slightest indication of refraction. It
follows, therefore, that the moon cannot be surrounded by an
atmosphere.
“In point of fact,” replied Ardan, “this is your chief, if not your
_only_ argument; and a really scientific man might be puzzled to answer
it. For myself, I will simply say that it is defective, because it
assumes that the angular diameter of the moon has been completely
determined, which is not the case. But let us proceed. Tell me, my dear
sir, do you admit the existence of volcanoes on the moon’s surface?”
“Extinct, yes! In activity, no!”
“These volcanoes, however, were at one time in a state of activity?”
“True, but, as they furnish themselves the oxygen necessary for
combustion, the mere fact of their eruption does not prove the presence
of an atmosphere.”
“Proceed again, then; and let us set aside this class of arguments in
order to come to direct observations. In 1715 the astronomers Louville
and Halley, watching the eclipse of the 3rd of May, remarked some very
extraordinary scintillations. These jets of light, rapid in nature, and
of frequent recurrence, they attributed to thunderstorms generated in
the lunar atmosphere.”
“In 1715,” replied the unknown, “the astronomers Louville and Halley
mistook for lunar phenomena some which were purely terrestrial, such as
meteoric or other bodies which are generated in our own atmosphere.
This was the scientific explanation at the time of the facts; and that
is my answer now.”
“On again, then,” replied Ardan; “Herschel, in 1787, observed a great
number of luminous points on the moon’s surface, did he not?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account