Lüshun (China) -- History -- Siege, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
On the 4th of September, having been reinforced by one brigade and
having command of two and a half divisions, General Kuroki decided to
advance. A dense fog screened our front and compelled us to proceed
with caution. But little or no resistance was encountered. The
five-peaked range was in our possession: the enemy had been expelled
from the colliery, and it was apparent that the Russians on our front
had retired. A mixed brigade marching from the coal mine discovered a
strong force in the hills four miles North and drove it out. Two and a
half miles to the South-west of the colliery another body of Russians
was encountered and engaged us in a confused sort of way until six
o’clock on the morning of the 5th, while five miles North-west of the
mine another skirmish lasted until morning.
At one o’clock on the morning of the 5th we occupied Sautowha, on the
main road ten miles north of Liao-yang, and in the afternoon shelled
the retreating columns of the enemy along the railway. Our losses were
heavy. From August 24th to September 5th the division operating on
our left flank had 2,082 casualties: 21 officers killed, 61 officers
wounded, 2,000 non-commissioned officers and men killed and wounded;
the central division had 2,024 casualties: 25 officers killed, 58
officers wounded, 1 officer missing, 1,940 non-commissioned officers
and men killed and wounded; the division on our right lost 1,540: 16
officers killed, 36 wounded, 1,421 non-commissioned officers and men
killed and wounded, and 67 missing. The reserves had 490 casualties,
making a total of 6,136 casualties, including 234 officers and 5,902
men. The proportion of killed to wounded was about five to one. The
army on our left in front of Liao-yang had 6,853 casualties, including
1,328 killed, of whom 56 were officers. The army on the extreme left
lost nearly 10,000.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account