Let us suppose that God had created only one being, and this being had ceased to exist; and let us see what would be the result of this hypothesis. God knows the existence and the non-existence of the object. This intellectual act is most simple; there can be no succession in it. There is properly no past with respect to God, and applied to the object this idea can only mean its non-existence in relation to its existence which is destroyed. When the ideas are presented in this light it is easy to understand that there is no past in God, but that there is the knowledge of past things. 65. On this hypothesis, how can the time of only one creature be measured? By its changes. But if it has none? On this imaginary supposition there would be no time. This conclusion is absolutely necessary, although it may at first sight seem strange. We must either abandon our definition of time, or else admit that there is no time where there is no change. 66. Whatever conclusions we form on questions founded on imaginary suppositions, this, at least, is certain--that the idea of past is essentially relative, and that on no supposition can we conceive the past, if we take from it all relation. The expression _has been_ implies both being and not-being,--the succession which constitutes time. In this relation the order is such that not-being is perceived after being, and this is why it is called past. 67. The idea of the future is also relative to the present. The future is inconceivable without this relation. The future is that which is to come,--that which is to be with respect to a real or hypothetical _now_; for we may apply to the future what we said of the past, that it is changed by changing the point of its reference. The future for us will be past to those who come after us; that which was future to those past, is present or past to us. The point of reference of the future is always a present moment; it cannot be referred to the past as its ultimate term; for it is in itself referred equally to the present. 68. Therefore all that we find in the idea of time that is absolute is the present. The present needs no relation. It not only needs none, but it admits none. We can neither refer it to the past nor to the future, because these two times both presuppose the idea of the present, without which they cannot even be conceived.