Fungi: Their Nature and UsesCooke, M. C. (Mordecai Cubitt)
Science
Fungi: Their Nature and Uses
Cooke, M. C. (Mordecai Cubitt)
Fungi
[I] W. G. Smith, in "Journ. Botany," March, 1873; Berkeley, in
"Grevillea," vol. i. p. 88.
[J] Fuckel, "Symbolæ Mycologicæ," p. 240.
[K] Robin, "Végét. Parasites," p. 622, t. viii. f. 1, 2.
[L] Tulasne, "Selecta Fung. Carp." iii. p. 12.
[M] "Hist. de l'Acad. des Sciences," 1769. Paris, 1772.
[N] Berkeley, "Crypt. Bot." p. 73; Hooker, "New Zealand Flora," ii.
338.
[O] "Philosophical Transactions," liii. (1763), p. 271.
[P] Berkeley's "Outlines," p. 30.
[Q] "Popular Science Review," vol. x. (1871), p. 25.
[R] Specimens of this mould were distributed in Cooke's "Fungi
Britannici Exsiccati," No. 356, under the name of _Clinotrichum
lanosum_.
[S] Cooke's "Handbook of British Fungi," p. 602.
[T] Cooke's "Fungi Britannici Exsiccati," No. 329, under the name of
_Sporidesmium polymorphum_ var. _chartarum_.
[U] This reminds one of Preuss's _Alternaria_, figured in Sturm's
"Flora;" it has been suggested that the mould, as seen when
examined under a power of 320 diam., is very much like a
_Macrosporium_. Again arises the question of the strings of
spores attached end to end.
[V] "Handbook of British Fungi," vol. ii. p. 926, No. 2,788.
XII.
CULTIVATION.
The cultivation of fungi in this country for esculent purposes is
confined to a single species, and yet there is no reason why, by a
series of well-conducted experiments, means should not be devised for
the cultivation of others, for instance, _Marasmius orcades_, and the
morel. Efforts have been made on the Continent for the cultivation of
truffles, but the success has hitherto been somewhat doubtful. For the
growth of the common mushroom, very little trouble and care is
required, and moderate success is certain. A friend of ours some years
since was fortunate enough to have one or two specimens of the large
puff-ball, _Lycoperdon giganteum_, growing in his garden. Knowing its
value, and being particularly fond of it when fried for breakfast, he
was anxious to secure its permanence. The spot on which the specimens
appeared was marked off and guarded, so that it was never desecrated
by the spade, and the soil remained consequently undisturbed. Year
after year, so long as he resided on the premises, he counted upon and
gathered several specimens of the puff-ball, the mycelium continuing
to produce them year after year. All parings, fragments, &c., not
utilized of the specimens eaten were cast on this spot to rot, so that
some of the elements might be returned to the soil. This was not true
cultivation perhaps, as the fungus had first established itself, but
it was preservation, and had its reward. It must be admitted, however,
that the size and number of specimens diminished gradually, probably
from exhaustion of the soil. This fungus, though strong, is much
approved by many palates, and its cultivation might be attempted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account