The reason of the fourth Lord Hertford’s self-condemned exile in Paris,
when he owned five palatial houses in London, besides Ragley, Sudbourne
and other places, is not easy to ascertain. There was a story, firmly
believed in my youth, and confirmed by Sir Richard Wallace to Sir John
Scott, that his father tried to force him into a cruel marriage with
the daughter of one of his mistresses, with whom he conspired to make
it appear that Lord Yarmouth, as he then was, had compromised the girl.
The young man deeply resented this outrage, and took refuge in Paris,
where his mother was living. Certainly he had established himself there
during his father’s lifetime, for it was as Lord Yarmouth that he bought
Bagatelle in 1830, and he did not succeed to the marquisate until twelve
years later.
Yriarte’s story that he left London on account of a quarrel with the
parish over the rates of his house in Piccadilly, is hardly to be
accepted. It is far more likely that he left England in order to free
himself from his father, for whom he had no love or respect, and made
Paris his home that he might be with his mother, whom he adored. She,
with Lord Henry Seymour and Monsieur Richard, lived at No. 1, Rue
Taitbout, Lord Hertford’s head-quarters being hard by at No. 2, Rue
Lafitte. There he lived the life of an invalid and sybarite, hardly to be
called happy in spite of his great possessions—a recluse, the darkness
of whose hypochondria was only cheered by his correspondence with Mr. S.
Mawson, who was his agent in London for the purchase, restoration and
care of pictures, or by some brilliant triumph at Christie’s or in the
Paris auction-rooms.
Few people saw him, and still fewer knew him. And yet he had all the
qualifications which would have enabled him to shine among his fellows.
Yriarte said of him: “Causeur célèbre, très spirituel, très lettré,
d’une politesse accomplie, d’un raffinement rare, ses goûts personnels
l’éloignaient cependant de la société, et il a vécu toute sa vie dans un
milieu inférieur. Il y apportait même avec ses intimes une manière d’être
dissimulée, peu conforme avec le cant anglais, et il affichait une sorte
de cynisme que les deux ou trois amis intimes qu’il a conservés jusqu’à
sa mort regardaient comme son masque d’emprunt.” His wit, if sometimes
a little cynical, or even a little risky, was undeniable, and what are
called “good stories” of him were the joy of clubs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account