The nation hardly knows how much it owes to the chivalrous
self-effacement of Sir John Scott. When Lady Wallace, to whom Sir Richard
had left everything, was about to make her will, she was anxious to
bequeath her whole property to Sir John in gratitude for the devotion
with which he had managed her affairs and cared for her interests.
Sir John persuaded her that it would be a good thing if she were, at
any rate, to leave the contents of Hertford House to the nation, and,
moreover, that if he were to inherit the entire fortune, there might be
some suspicion of undue influence. If, on the other hand, she gave her
chief art treasures to England, her memory would be venerated as perhaps
the country’s greatest benefactress, while he could gratefully and
honourably accept whatever else she might be pleased to bequeath to him.
The lady followed his advice. He was a large-minded and generous man, and
though, as it turned out, he became the heir to a great fortune, it must
never be forgotten that he might have inherited property worth at that
time, according to the late Mr. Charles Davis’s computation, at least
seven millions sterling, and now, in view of the amazing rise in the
value of all works of art, perhaps as much more. It was a most courageous
and loyal piece of self-sacrifice. One day, when I said this to a man
who was inclined to scoff, his answer was: “Yes, but look at the Death
Duties that he would have had to pay.” He could have met those by the
sale of half a dozen pictures. Nothing, to my mind, can detract from the
patriotic wisdom and generosity of Sir John’s conduct.
When the greatest collection of art treasures that ever was in any
private hands became the property of the nation, the next question was
how and where to house it. Sir Michael Hicks-Beach was Chancellor of the
Exchequer at the time, and he appointed a Committee, of which he asked me
to be a member, to consider the matter. Lord Lansdowne was our chairman,
and, after careful discussion, we came to the conclusion that the best
plan to adopt would be, if possible, to purchase the freehold of Hertford
House from the Portman Estate, and house the collection in its old home,
turning the bedrooms on the first floor and the stables into galleries.
There was an idea favoured by Sir Edward Poynter that it would be wise
to separate some of the pictures—the Spanish paintings, for example—and
place them in the National Gallery; but that scheme would have been
against the provisions of the will, which insisted upon nothing being
taken from, and nothing added to, the collection as it stood, so the
proposal could not be entertained. Sir Edward would have wished the whole
collection placed in a building to be erected adjoining the National
Gallery; this was also overruled.
Upon this subject Lord Esher writes:
“The Committee to which you allude was appointed under a
Treasury Minute of the 3rd of May, 1897.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account