Like the Chancellor, Prince Gortchakoff, he was very kind to me, and
whenever we met in Society, he always had a friendly word for me. When
I got back to London, he was next to Prince Gortchakoff, the Russian
statesman in whom I found Lord Palmerston and Lord Clarendon the most
interested. They fully appreciated the greatness of his work in the
emancipation business, and were glad to have some first-hand impressions
of his very remarkable personality.
The emancipation was a colossal task. It is not possible by a mere stroke
of the pen to revolutionize the lives of twenty-three millions of men.
The serfs were to be freed—that is easily said; but the interests of the
landed aristocracy must also be taken into consideration, and it says
much for Valouieff’s statesmanship and wisdom that the measure should
have been carried into effect practically without any friction.
It was impossible suddenly to deprive of its labour the whole of the
agricultural land of that vast empire. There had to be a transition
period during which the peasants, though no longer serfs, still remained
under certain obligations to their former masters; but within the
space of two years the landlords were bound to make over to them their
houses with suitable allotments of land against a fair rent, with the
further privilege of purchase, with the consent of the proprietor. The
obligations of the peasant and his rent were capitalized on a basis of
six per cent. Of this capital, twenty per cent. was to be paid at once
to the landlord, while the Government gave him the remaining eighty per
cent. in Government bonds bearing five per cent. interest, the Government
recouping itself for this advance in forty-nine years by a payment of six
per cent. from the peasant. The purchases might be effected by single
individuals or by partnerships. This would be facilitated by the Russian
communal system, by which the members of each commune were able to
combine for the redemption money and other expenses.
It was calculated that about one-third of the property of the landed
aristocracy, equal to 390,886 square kilometres, was made over to the
peasants. This is Brockhaus’ calculation. He goes on to point out
that for various reasons, chiefly the ignorance and intemperance of
the peasants, there were not a few troubles arising out of the great
economic change. Although in some instances land soon rose in value
fifty per cent. above the estimate of 1861, in others it suffered great
deterioration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account