We may be asked, since we have so grand a pine of our own, why import
from abroad so many aliens, many of which are certainly not its superiors
in beauty? I suppose that the answer must be that of the daily partridge
which the domestically faithless French king brought in argument against
the remonstrances of his father-confessor. Besides, it can hardly be
denied that many of them are exquisitely beautiful. One of the lovely
blue spruces from Pike’s Peak in Colorado, looking as if it had been
dyed in the mystic waters of the Grotto Azzurra of Capri,[9] strikes an
altogether new note in our garden landscape; the steeple of a tapering
cypress will give that perpendicular line which is so valuable to the
painter, as we may see in Italian gardens, in the picturesque cemeteries
of Constantinople, and all over the Levant. A blue cedar from the Atlas
range in North Africa, its branches feathering down to the ground in
graceful profusion, catches the slanting rays of the sun and sends them
back to you as if its leaves were sprinkled with hoar-frost or wrought
in some luminous metal. But it is idle to compile lists and catalogues.
They make dull writing and duller reading. Suffice it to say that the
intrinsic beauties of the many trees, shrubs, lianes and vines, which
have been added to our own lovely flora, furnish an ample justification
for their admission into our homes.
But apart from this there is the collector’s mania to be reckoned with.
Most men take a pride in showing their friends some gem, some treasured
rarity, and the gardener is as proud of his collection of unique
plants as the Hertfords, the Rothschilds and the Pierpont Morgans have
been of their pictures and miniatures, their Sèvres porcelain, or the
masterpieces of Riesener, Gouthière and Caffieri. The plant collector
has this advantage over those famous lovers of the living works of dead
artists that he can gratify his whims and vanity so much more cheaply.
“What brought Sir Visto’s ill-got wealth to waste?
Some Demon whispered—Visto, have a taste.”
Even orchids are cheap in comparison with Rembrandts, Vandycks, Sir
Joshuas and Gainsboroughs. It stands to reason that the gathering
together of such treasures as may be seen at Westonbirt, at Aldenham, at
Frensham, and in one or two other collectors’ gardens, cannot be achieved
without a considerable expenditure of money, guided by consummate
knowledge; but, even so, the cost is relatively small. And the owners of
lesser pleasaunces with small outlay can profit by the experience and
public spirit of those gardening magnates, both professional and amateur,
who combine to send out costly expeditions to new fields of adventure
and discovery in order to add to the treasure stores of horticulture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account