The name Richard seems to me to have some significance in confirmation of
the above story. Is it likely that if the child had been Lady Hertford’s,
she should have chosen the name of her eldest legitimate and deeply-loved
son, to bestow it upon an inconvenient accident? To me it seems utterly
incredible. Moreover, would it not have been far more likely that she
should have tried to smuggle away an unnecessary infant of her own than
that she should have dragged the child into all the publicity of the home
about which there had already been too much slanderous gossip? Again,
Lady Hertford was a woman possessed of great wealth in her own right.
Why, if Sir Richard was her son, did she leave the whole of her fortune
to her second son, Lord Henry Seymour, and a mere trifle to the favourite
to whom she was so kind a patroness? Obviously she relied upon Lord
Hertford, as his father, to do everything for him. Not only the facts,
but even the whole probabilities, are against the preposterous and
malicious story that he was her son.
That the old lady was devotedly attached to Sir Richard and made a great
pet of him, and that he returned her affection with interest, was a
matter of common knowledge. I have seen many letters of hers which attest
the fact. When she travelled, he made all the arrangements for her, and
took entire charge of her comfort, his bed being made outside her door
when they slept at inns in the old posting days. He was her devoted
slave, her most faithful watch-dog.
Upon his services as secretary, Lord Hertford, as I have said, placed
entire reliance, but his office was not altogether a bed of roses. The
great man, as a patron, was strict and sometimes severe. Sir Richard,
with a taste for speculation on the Bourse, was sometimes in rather
strait circumstances, out of which his patron helped him, not without
reproof, to the tune of a good many thousand pounds. I have seen a
document showing that Lord Hertford in 1854 paid twenty thousand pounds
on this account through Messrs. Rothschild. There is in the Wallace
Collection a certain engraved crystal tazza of Italian workmanship, a
very lovely little gem. Sir Richard, in his poor days, picked it up for
a few francs in an old sort of rag-and-bone shop in a street in the
neighbourhood of the Temple. Some time afterwards, being rather hard
up, he took it to Lord Hertford and asked him to buy it. “No,” was the
answer, “I won’t have it. I will not encourage your extravagance; you
must learn to be more economical.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account