G. A. Selwyn, D.D.: Bishop of New Zealand and LichfieldCreighton, Louise
History
G. A. Selwyn, D.D.: Bishop of New Zealand and Lichfield
Creighton, Louise
Selwyn, George Augustus, 1809-1878
A body of armed Maoris gathered to avenge his death on the settlers, who
fled in terror from their homes. Selwyn at once hastened to the spot to
make peace. He rode twenty-four miles through the night, and then walked
through the wood wading in mud up to his knees to the place where the
fighting party were expected to land in their canoes. He wrote to his
son:
“We could see at once by the open and bright expression of their
countenances, that they did not mean mischief. The afternoon was spent
as usual in much talk upon the subject and ended with evening service
in a large house, filled with about two hundred men, with their arms
piled around the central pillars.... We were glad to find that they
were inclined to go back quietly.”
Afterwards he visited and pacified other natives in the district, and
encouraged the settlers to return to their homes, promising to remain
with them till the danger was past. One of them wrote afterwards:
“And so he did, guarding us with jealous care, never seeming to sleep
soundly, for upon any unusual noise in the night, he was up and out in
a moment. On the Sunday he conducted in our little schoolroom divine
service, and preached a sermon never to be forgotten—inspiring trust
and confidence in God.”
Selwyn’s plea which he submitted in a formal memorandum to the Governor,
was that the rights of the New Zealanders as British subjects should be
considered identical with those of the English, that the rights of the
Maoris to the soil where the title deeds had not been extinguished
should be recognised; that all native customs in connexion with
proprietary right should be respected, that disputes should be submitted
to a competent tribunal, and that for the moment there should be an
armistice. But he was not listened to, and the settlers denounced his
conduct as political interference. They said that “no right to interfere
between Her Majesty’s Government and her native subjects could be
allowed to any minister of religion.” In his reply to these criticisms
he said (1861) “as the earliest settlers in this country—as agents
employed by Government in native affairs—as intimately acquainted with
the language, customs and feelings of the native race—and above all as
ministers of religion having the highest possible interest at stake—we
assert the privilege which the Crown allows to every man of laying our
petitions before the Crown and the Legislature.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account