"Colonel Starbottle would show that personating the character and taking
the name of Grace Conroy, an absent sister of the accused, Mrs. Conroy,
then really Madame Devarges, sought the professional aid of the
impulsive and generous Ramirez to establish her right to a claim then
held by the accused--in fact, wrongfully withheld from his own sister,
Grace Conroy. That Ramirez, believing implicitly in the story of Madame
Devarges with the sympathy of an overflowing nature, gave her that aid
until her marriage with Gabriel exposed the deceit. Colonel Starbottle
would not characterise the motives of such a marriage. It was apparent
to the jury. They were intelligent men, and would detect the unhallowed
combination of two confederates, under the sacrament of a holy
institution, to deceive the trustful Ramirez. It was a nuptial feast at
which--er--er--Mercury presided, and not--er--er--Hymen. Its only issue
was fraud and murder. Having obtained possession of the property in a
common interest, it was necessary to remove the only witness of the
fraud, Ramirez. The wife found a willing instrument in the husband. And
how was the deed committed? Openly and in the presence of witnesses? Did
Gabriel even assume a virtue, and under the pretext of an injured
husband challenge the victim to the field of honour? No! No, gentlemen.
Look at the murderer, and contrast his enormous bulk with
the--er--slight, graceful, youthful figure of the victim, and you will
have an idea of the--er--er--enormity of the crime."
After this exordium came the _testimony--i.e._, facts coloured more or
less unconsciously, according to the honest prejudices of the observer,
his capacity to comprehend the fact he had observed, and his disposition
to give his theory regarding that fact rather than the fact itself. And
when the blind had testified to what they saw, and the halt had stated
where they walked and ran, the prosecution rested with a flush of
triumph.
They had established severally: that the deceased had died from the
effects of a knife wound; that Gabriel had previously quarrelled with
him and was seen on the hill within a few hours of the murder; that he
had absconded immediately after, and that his wife was still a fugitive,
and that there was ample motive for the deed in the circumstances
surrounding the prisoner.
Much of this was shaken on cross-examination. The surgeon who made the
autopsy was unable to say whether the deceased, being consumptive, might
not have died from consumption that very night. The witness who saw
Gabriel pushing the deceased along the road, could not swear positively
whether the deceased were not pulling Gabriel instead, and the evidence
of Mrs. Conroy's imposture was hearsay only. Nevertheless bets were
offered in favour of Starbottle against Poinsett--that being the form in
which the interest of One Horse Gulch crystallised itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account