don't love. It is no matter how inferior Jane may be to Frederic. A
woman can feel a good many things that she cannot analyze or
understand, and there never yet was a woman so stupid that she did not
know whether or not her husband loved her, and was not either stricken
or savage to find that he did not. No woman ever was born with a heart
so small that anything less than the whole of her husband's heart could
fill it.
Moreover, apart from unhappy consequences, there is a right and a wrong
about it. How dare a man stand up solemnly before God and his fellows
with a lie in his right hand? and if he does do it, how dare a poet or
a novelist step up and glorify him in it? The man who commits a crime
does not do so much mischief as the man who turns the criminal into a
hero. Frederic Graham did a weak, wicked, mean, and cowardly deed, not
being in his general nature weak, wicked, mean, or cowardly, and was
allowed to blunder on to a tolerable sort of something like happiness
in the end. No one has a right to complain, for all of us get a great
deal more and better than we deserve. We have no right to complain of
Providence, but we have a right to complain of the poet who comes up
and says not a word in reprobation of the meanness and cowardice, not a
word of the cruelty inflicted upon Jane, nor the wrong done to his own
soul; but veils the wickedness, excites our sympathy and pity, and in
fact makes Frederic out to be a sort of sublime and suffering martyr.
He was no martyr at all. Nobody is a martyr, if he cannot help
himself. If Frederic had the least spirit of martyrdom, he would have
breasted his sorrow manfully and alone. Instead of which, he shuffled
himself and his misery upon poor simple Jane, getting all the solace he
could from her, and leading her a wretched, almost hopeless life for
years. This is what we are to admire! This is the knight without
reproach! This is to be Faithful Forever! I suppose Coventry Patmore
thinks Frederic is to be commended because he did not break into
Honoria's house and run away with her. That is the only thing he could
have done worse than he did do, and that I have no doubt he would have
done if he could. I have no faith in the honor or the virtue of men or
women who will marry where they do not love. I think it is just as
sinful--and a thousand times as vile--to marry unlovingly, as to love
unlawfully.[*]
[*] Some one just here suggests that it was Jane who was faithful
forever, not Frederic. That indeed makes the title appropriate, but
does not relieve the atrocity of the plot.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account