Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia: From Authentic SourcesGebler, Karl von
Religion
Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia: From Authentic Sources
Gebler, Karl von
Astronomers -- Italy -- Biography; Catholic Church. Curia romana; Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642; Religion and science -- History
_Inquisitor_: “You must state what his Eminence Cardinal
Bellarmine told you about the aforesaid decision, and whether
he said anything else on the subject, and what?”
_Galileo_: “Signor Cardinal Bellarmine signified to me that
the aforesaid opinion of Copernicus might be held as a
conjecture, as it had been held by Copernicus, and his eminence
was aware that, like Copernicus, I only held that opinion as
a conjecture, which is evident from an answer of the same
Signor Cardinal to a letter of Father Paolo Antonio Foscarini,
provincial of the Carmelites, of which I have a copy, and in
which these words occur: ‘It appears to me that your reverence
and Signor Galileo act wisely in contenting yourselves with
speaking _ex suppositione_, and not with certainty.’ This
letter of the cardinal’s is dated 12th April, 1615.[354] It
means, in other words, that that opinion, taken absolutely,
must not be either held or defended.”
Galileo was now requested to state what was decreed in February, 1616,
and communicated to him.
_Galileo_: “In the month of February, 1616, Signor Cardinal
Bellarmine told me that as the opinion of Copernicus, if
adopted absolutely, was contrary to Holy Scripture, it must
neither be held nor defended, but that it might be held
hypothetically, and written about in this sense. In accordance
with this I possess a certificate of the said Signor Cardinal
Bellarmine, given on 26th May, 1616, in which he says that the
Copernican opinion may neither be held nor defended, as it is
opposed to Holy Scripture, of which certificate I herewith
submit a copy.”[355]
_Inquisitor_: “When the above communication was made to you,
were any other persons present, and who?”
_Galileo_: “When Signor Cardinal Bellarmine made known to
me what I have reported about the Copernican views, some
Dominican fathers were present, but I did not know them, and
have never seen them since.”
_Inquisitor_: “Was any other command communicated to you on
this subject, in the presence of those fathers, by them or any
one else, and what?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account