From all that has been said it follows, 1st. that the sympathies of animal sensibility appear to be in the greatest number of cases an aberration of the principle that perceives in us, and which is deceived as to the place in which the causes of sensation act; 2d. that the sympathies of animal contractility require inevitably the intervention of the brain, but we know not how the part affected acts upon this viscus, though we know very well how this viscus sympathetically excited reacts upon the muscles to make them contract; 3d. that the causes of the two kinds of organic sympathies are absolutely unknown and that a thick veil hides the agents of communication which connects, in this case, the organ from which the sympathetic influence goes to that which receives it. It is this obscurity of the sympathetic causes, that has made me entirely neglect every kind of hypothetical opinion, in classing the sympathies in this work, in which I examine them in each system of organs. I have had regard only to a natural division, to that indicated by the vital forces of which the sympathies are but an irregular exercise. Now by limiting ourselves to the most rigorous observation, it is evident that this division is the only one that is admissible; and I believe that there is no other to be employed, until our knowledge shall be sufficiently extended to admit of their being classed by the causes that produce them, and not by the results they present. Besides I cannot recommend too strongly the necessity of distinguishing what belongs to them from that which arises from the natural connexion of functions. Observe what takes place in syncope, apoplexy and asphyxia; one organ is disordered; all the others soon cease to act. Sympathies have no part in these phenomena. Physicians have been much embarrassed by classing these affections, sometimes as if they belonged to the nerves, at others to the sanguineous system, &c. This is what takes place in each.