I would remark upon this subject that the anastomoses furnish the first proof of a truth which we shall soon demonstrate more in detail, viz. that in the great trunks, the blood is especially influenced by the heart, and that in the capillaries, it is exclusively by the vascular parietes. In fact it is because the vitality of the arteries is every thing for the motion of the last subdivisions, that the least alterations that they experience give rise to many engorgements that inevitably require anastomoses, which are extremely numerous at the end of the arterial tree. On the other hand, the vitality of the trunks having scarcely any influence upon the blood, it experiences but few obstacles in passing through them; there is less need then of anastomoses, which are in fact more rare there. If the least cause, the least irritation produced spasm of the trunks, as they produce that of their last divisions, it would be necessary that they should communicate as frequently together. A fleshy texture in the great arteries, and vital properties analogous to the involuntary muscles, would have required inevitably these numerous anastomoses, because a variety of causes influencing these kinds of muscles, they can at any moment increase unnaturally their contraction, diminish their caliber and embarrass the progress of the fluids that traverse them. _Forms of the Arteries in their course._ Many physicians of the present age have described each artery as forming a cone, the base of which is towards the heart, and the apex towards the extremities. If we examine a portion of it between the origin of two branches, whether after having injected it, or by cutting it perpendicularly when it is empty, or by measuring it when it is full of blood, we find it always cylindrical. Undoubtedly considered in its whole extent, it takes a conical form, the effect of its successive diminution by the branches it furnishes; but in this sense it is less a cone, than a series of cylinders successively joined to each other and always decreasing. Considered in its general arrangement, the arterial system represents on the contrary, as I have said, a cone absolutely inverted, that is to say, having its base at all the parts and its apex at the heart; so that the aorta has a diameter less considerable in proportion, than that of the sum of all the branches. We have a proof of this by comparing a trunk with two branches that succeed it; these surpass it in diameter, and the relation being always the same in all the subdivisions, we conceive that the capacity of the arterial system goes uniformly increasing.