Moreover compare the properties of texture of the arteries with those of the muscles; compare their vital properties, by examining the articles in which I treat of these properties; compare their development, and especially the different morbid alterations to which the two are subject, and you will see that there is not a single relation in which they have the least analogy. The aneurism of the heart and that of the arteries have nothing in common but the name. In one there is a rupture of the arterial fibres, a dilatation of the cellular coat; in the other an unnatural increase, a real development of muscular fibres which preserve their appearance and their properties. Notwithstanding the ease with which the arterial fibres are broken in cases of aneurism, they enjoy in a natural state a very considerable degree of resistance and force; another character that distinguishes them from the fleshy texture. The following are the proofs of this resistance, which takes place both transversely and longitudinally. 1st. If we tie the carotid artery above, and drive a fluid afterwards into it, great force must be employed to break its texture. The same thing happens when we force in air instead of a liquid. Frequently the efforts of a man are insufficient to produce a rupture; thus the force of the heart can never cause it suddenly; so that the formation of aneurisms takes place only from the long continued action upon the arterial parietes; I doubt whether these tumours can be formed, without a previous alteration of the arterial texture, by the force of the impulse of the blood alone against the weak parietes of the arteries. 2d. The resistance of these parietes takes place longitudinally also. If we draw in a contrary direction, the two ends of an artery and of a muscle, we effect with more difficulty the rupture of the first, when the dead body is the subject of this comparative experiment. But upon the living the effect is opposite; the vessel yields to a very strong action made upon it; it would be necessary that this action should be incomparably greater to divide the muscle. This difference arises evidently from the vital properties of the latter, which in this case contracts violently, whilst the artery can make no further resistance than from the nature of its texture. Besides, this longitudinal resistance to distension is less than the lateral resistance opposed to the injection; experiments prove it, and it arises without doubt from this, that no fibre, in the first case, is found directly opposed to the effort.