It is not the contraction of the arteries that drives the blood to their extremities. This is so true, that if you open one of these vessels at a distance from the heart, each jet that the blood will make in going out, will correspond to each contraction of the ventricle. Now if the arteries drove the blood to all the extremities, by contracting, their contraction and relaxation would alternate with those of the heart; but if it was so, each jet of the arterial throw should correspond to each relaxation of the ventricle; the contrary of this is the case as I have just said. From this we see how very inaccurate is the common opinion, which I believed myself for many years, viz. that the auricles contract at the same time with the arteries, and the veins at the same time with the ventricles. The circulation of red blood is thus explained; 1st, the pulmonary veins drive the blood into the left auricle. 2d. This by contracting forces it into the ventricle, which dilates to receive it. 3d. This last contracts afterwards, sends it to the aorta which dilates at the instant of contraction; 4th, then this contracts to drive it to all the parts. This last does not take place; you can never observe it like the others, in a living animal. Examine as closely as possible, a great artery laid bare; it rises, but it does not dilate hardly at all in an ordinary state, nor does it contract. Contraction of the left ventricle; general motion of all the arterial blood; the entrance of this blood into the capillary system, are three things that take place at the same instant. It is like the blow on the timber, that is felt at one end, at the same time that it is received at the opposite. We can form a very accurate idea of the circulation by examining the mesenteric arteries through the peritoneum, after having opened the abdomen of an animal; at each pulsation you see them all simultaneously rise and pulsate at their extremity as well as at their origin. It is impossible to form an idea of the arterial motion, by considering the wave or undulation of blood as extending itself at each contraction in the arteries, and arriving afterwards successively at the extremities. Read all the authors upon the circulation; you will see that there is no subject that is treated oftener or more at length, than that of the course of the arterial blood, and yet there is no one in which you are left in more doubt and obscurity. Why? because all go upon a false principle, and all the consequences are inaccurate, where the principle itself is not correct.