The air acts incessantly upon the cutaneous organ. In the ordinary state, it constantly removes from its surface the sweat that is exhaled from it. Fourcroy, who has paid particular attention to the solution of the transpired fluid by the surrounding air, appears to me to have allowed too much influence to this solution upon transpiration. In fact there are two very distinct things in this function; 1st, the action of the exhalants which throw out the fluid; 2d, the action of the air which dissolves and evaporates it. Now the first of these is wholly independent of the other. Whether the fluid is dissolved or not, more is still furnished by the exhalants. If the solution does not take place, the fluid accumulates upon the skin, which remains moist; but this moisture does not obstruct the exhalant pores and prevent new moisture from being added to it. A comparison will render this very evident. In the natural state, the serous fluids are constantly exhaled and absorbed; the absorbents perform for them the functions of the air which dissolves the sweat; now, though these vessels cease to act, as in dropsies, the exhalants continue their action; there arises only a serous collection, which, though applied to the orifices of the exhalants, does not prevent them from pouring out more serum. The bladder in vain contains urine which presses upon the opening of the ureters, these ducts do not pour less into it. Though the mucous juices become stagnant on their respective surfaces, new juices are however poured upon these surfaces. So though the skin remains moist from the want of solution of the transpiration, more transpiration is nevertheless exhaled. Solution is a physical phenomenon wholly foreign to the vital phenomenon of exhalation. We transpire in a bath as well as in the air; only the fluid which arises from it is mixed with the water, instead of being reduced to vapour.