Some modern authors have said that there is detached from the external covering of the hairs a kind of scales which form as it were little branches to them. We do not see these elongations. However the experiment mentioned by Fourcroy, and which consists in this, that by rubbing a hair between the fingers, it is raised like the heads of some species of grain in the direction from its base to its point, this experiment, I say, appears to prove the existence of these insensible elongations, which perform also an essential part in the adhesion of the hairs of the head to each other, an adhesion that is such that when they have remained a long time without being separated, as in long diseases, it is only done with the greatest difficulty. Sometimes the hairs are bifurcated in a very evident manner at their extremity. It is the greater or less thickness of the epidermoid covering of the hairs, which constitutes the different nature of them. Thick and compact on the genital parts, the chin, &c. it is less easily penetrated with water, and renders the hairs more elastic there and more capable of curling. Loose and thin in the hairs of the head, it makes them more smooth, and gives them more sensibly the property of the hygrometer. It is the peculiar nature of this external covering, which gives to the hairs of the head and the hair of negroes the character which distinguishes them. From what we have just said it is evident that the external covering of the hairs of the head is the part of them which is essentially inert and foreign to life. It is not the same with their internal substance. III. _Internal Substance of the Hairs._ This substance is the most important; it is this which essentially characterizes the hairs, which I should have ranked in the epidermoid system, if they had nothing but their external covering, as is the case when they become white. We are entirely ignorant of the nature of this internal substance. It can only be presumed that there are extremely delicate vessels inclosed in the common epidermoid covering containing a colouring substance, which stagnates in these vessels, or at least is subjected in them to a very slow nutritive motion. Among these vessels, do any of them as on the skin, open outwards to throw off fluids? Many physiologists have thought so, and on this account they have considered the hairs as real emunctories. I do not believe that we have any anatomical data upon this point; but the plica polonica, a singular disease in which the hair when cut pours out blood, evidently proves that they have exhalants in a natural state, which then becoming enlarged and dilated, pour out a fluid that they before refused to admit. Besides, there is no doubt that the pilous exhalants, infinitely less active than the cutaneous, are a much less copious emunctory. As to the absorptions which some have pretended are made by the vessels of the hairs, I think that nothing can prove them.