The second general mucous membrane, which we have called the genito-urinary, enters in man by the urethra, and thence is spread on the one hand upon the bladder, the ureters, the pelvis of the kidnies, the infundibula, the papillæ and the capillary tubes which open on their summit; on the other hand it goes into the excretory tubes of the prostate, into the seminal ducts, the vesiculæ seminales, the vasa deferentia and the branches with numberless windings that produce them. In woman, this membrane is introduced by the os externum and penetrating on the one hand by the urethra, goes as in man upon the urinary organs; on the other hand, we see it enter the vagina, lining it, the uterus and the fallopian tubes, and afterwards becoming continuous with the peritoneum by the opening of these tubes. It is the only example in the economy, of a communication established between the mucous and serous surfaces. This manner of describing the course of the mucous surfaces, by saying that they are elongated, dip down, penetrate, &c. from one cavity to another, is no doubt not conformable to the progress of nature, which creates in each organ the membranes belonging to this organ, and does not thus extend them by degrees; but our manner of understanding it is better adapted to this language, the meaning of which the least reflection will show. In thus referring to two general membranes all the mucous surfaces, I am not only supported by anatomical inspection, but pathological observation has also furnished me with points of demarcation between the two, and points of contact between the different portions of membranes of which each is the assemblage. In the different descriptions of catarrhal epidemics given by authors, we frequently see one of these membranes affected in all parts, the other remaining sound; it is especially not rare to observe a general affection of the first, of that which extends from the mouth, the nose, the surface of the eye, into the alimentary canal and the bronchial vessels. The last epidemic observed at Paris, with which Pinal himself was affected, was of this character; that of 1761, described by Razou, had it also; that of 1752, described in the memoirs of the Society of Edinburgh was remarkable for a similar phenomenon; now, we do not see at that time a corresponding affection in the mucous membrane that is spread upon the urinary organs and upon those of generation. There is then here, 1st, an analogy between the portions of the first, by the uniformity of affection; 2d, a demarcation between the two by the health of the one and the disease of the other.