The softness of the mucous corion makes me presume that it is easily altered by the digestive juices, not that I confide in the experiments of Hunter, who pretended that these juices could act upon the coat that secretes them, but because in general I have observed that the textures like it yield very easily to the action of water in maceration and are also very easily digested. I have not however any experiment upon the subject, and we know that in the animal economy analogy is not always a faithful guide. All the mucous surfaces, but especially that of the stomach and intestines, have the property of curdling milk, as have many other substances, especially the acids. Is it to this property that must be attributed a phenomenon which is constant during life, viz. the coagulation of milk that enters the stomach for digestion? or is this phenomenon owing to the mixture of this fluid with those which are secreted by the surface of this organ? I think that both these causes contribute to it at the same time; both separate produce in fact this phenomenon. Spallanzani has proved it as it respects the gastric juices. Every body knows that the mucous membrane dried, and consequently deprived of these juices, preserves the property of coagulating milk. Spallanzani has convinced himself that the serous and organic muscular systems of the stomach are destitute of it. Are aphthæ an affection of the mucous corion? do they belong to the papillæ? are they seated in the glands? are they a separate inflammation of these glands, whilst catarrhs are characterized by a general inflammation of a considerable extent of the mucous system? All these questions deserve to be examined. Pinel has perceived the void there is in morbid anatomy upon this point. _Mucous Papillæ._ The peculiar kind of sensibility which the skin enjoys is attributed principally, as we know, to what is called the papillary body, which commonly is not easy to be demonstrated. The sensibility of the mucous membranes, somewhat analogous to that of the skin, appears to me to have the same kind of organization, which is perceived with infinitely less ease. The papillæ of this system cannot be called in question at its origin, where it dips into the cavities, in the commencement even of these cavities, as upon the tongue, the palate, the internal part of the alæ of the nose, upon the glans penis, in the fossa navicularis, within the lips, &c. Inspection is sufficient to demonstrate them there. But it is asked if the papillæ exist also in the deep-seated parts of this system. Analogy indicates it, since the sensibility is as great there as at their origin, though with varieties that we shall point out; but inspection proves it in a manner not less certain. I think that the villi with which we everywhere see them covered are nothing but these papillæ.